Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> (The top ver stops at this time. The netape begins with Mr. Ballagain discussing the <br /> individual applications for the tenants of Deer Crossing.) <br /> Mr. Ball states that would.have to review each applications haat are f om.tenants that <br /> were present from 1995 ongoing. When the applicant came in they would have to <br /> prove to the board when, where and hove they go to the current seating number. In <br /> other words why and how did they get to 77 and Whatever...The people could <br /> continue to operate until it was resolved. Anything else? <br /> Ms.. Grady stated that-they needed to beep in mind that they would not approve over <br /> 10,000 GPD. <br /> Mr. Ball re-iterat d that they would not approve over 10,000 GPD. Nov that they <br /> had everything here. Prior to that they probably unknowingly and the applicant <br /> unknowingly got thein over the 1 ,000 GPD. They would never do that anyways. <br /> This happened after 1995. They had no clue. That was why they were in this spot <br /> now. They had the opportunity to fix it. They had the opportunity to all get together <br /> to fix it themselves to get it to the 10,000 GPD. They wanted the denitrification <br /> i systems in the ground. Their most important project here was to protect the public <br /> and the environment and the streams. It had been over two years. It was said and <br /> done. When they could start operations, as soon as they could. He would lite to see <br /> it next week. They would like to see a backhoe down there digging, <br /> Ir. Haj j r stated that they were very pleased and were looking forward to putting it <br /> in. <br /> Ir. Costello introduced himself to the people at the hearing as town counsel. H <br /> clarified that what they were doing there was approving the system haat had been <br /> submitted. It did meet all of the technical requirements. They would take into <br /> account the approved proposed system when considering the pending applications <br /> properly submitted by the restaurants. As of today when the deadline for filing the <br /> applications that was closed there were three applications pending from three <br /> establishments from three establishments within the condominium. They would <br /> consider those three applications. He did not believe that the board was in the <br /> position at this point in time to determine a set number of seats. They had to look at <br /> the totality ofthe circumstances, as they exist right now. They were looking ahead to <br /> 2005. Legally they had to consider the circumstances, as they exist now. As they <br /> exist noir as it appeared to hire based on his discussions and his review-of the files <br /> earlier tonight Haat they may have a substantially different seating capacity situation <br /> this year than they did in the prior gears due to the fact that some restaurant <br /> establishments within the condominium who had filed for permits previously had <br /> not done so and perhaps do not intend to do so in 20 . They would look at the <br /> situation as it existed and make a determination accordingly. Anything else? <br /> Mr. Dalton asked who had not applied for permits for this year. <br /> 10 <br />