My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/06/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
01/06/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:06:50 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:47:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/06/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 i . <br /> might think that everybody had solid jobs and that there were plenty of them to go <br /> around. Or that it was an easy time finding new jobs. But, that was simply not the <br /> case and there are a lot of people who struggle. By Mr. Richardi's estimate he would <br /> have twenty-five full time employees there with forty in the summer. He thought <br /> that as an area he could not afford to lose these jobs. people struggle. He saw that all <br /> the time. They didn't always get to know who was struggling. But, when you were <br /> in his position you find out. Where were a lot of people who were struggling. It was <br /> imperative that you keep dais business going, He just granted to commend him on <br /> running a good business and to king forward to extending it. He thanked ed the hoard. <br /> IVH Grady asked if there was anyone else. <br /> Mr. Hajjar stated that Mr. Richardi may be a good businessman and all but it had <br /> nothing to do with the capacity of the septic system. They had a septic system that <br /> had x amount of flow and Mr. Richardi wanted to put this much flow into the <br /> system. It just didn't wofk. <br /> Mr. Dalton stated that he just wanted to make one continent. He didn't want to <br /> repeat what was said before. Mr. Richardi didn't wart to start a flow that had been <br /> any different than it had been since 1997. He just wanted to maintain the existing <br /> M <br /> flow. <br /> Mr. McGrath wanted to say one thing. That according to the IEP it didn't matter. <br /> There was a violation of Title V and as far as the DEP was concerned it could not be <br /> fixed. They could not increase the flog or they would be forced to go into <br /> groundwater discharge permit. They were in a terrible box. The permit that was <br /> issued said Haat there was going to be some physical work that was supposed to be <br /> done. It was never clone. You can't do the work now. So what happens is that the <br /> septic system only had the capacity of the original design, which was other than the <br /> service the system of restaurants seats. The septic tants were never sufficient in size. <br /> Mr. Patrick Brady he just wanted to put it on the record. He wasn't sure if he should <br /> put it on right now.or at the next appointment for Deer Crossing. But, he would life <br /> to submit to the hoard just again to put it on the regard the complete set o <br /> condominium documents, which govern the condominium units. Also it tells wh <br /> was responsible for septic systems because in the last meeting it seemed to be some <br /> confusion of what the owners-of the septic system of the common areas. He would <br /> like to present the complete set of the condominium documents to the board. Also <br /> two copies of the CMR specifically 3 10.CMR 15 3 0.1 which specified condominium <br /> units. That the association had the responsibility for the septic system. The <br /> 1 OCMR 15 2 0.3, which specified the gallons per each type of establishment. She <br /> wasn't so sure that those had been entered into the board. But, the bard should have <br /> those gust so it was on the record. But, 1t was clear that this was a condominium. He <br /> believed that there was confusion in some of the things that were said were in error <br /> o ownership and responsibility. There was a question as to who has standing in <br /> order to request an increase where it was a tenant and not a unit owner. Secondly, <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.