My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/3/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
2/3/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:22:08 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:50:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/03/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
methodology of hover the construction went it was always four-bedrooms. The hoard <br /> f health was kind enough to confirm that it was indeed a Four-bedroom residence. <br /> The earlier test of the leach pit suggests that it was a 1000-gallon septic tank. What <br /> they were thea proposing to do was to increase the master bedroom to make it more <br /> functional for the clients out to the side. They were not adding any bedrooms. They <br /> were just going to extend the master bedroom to give it a more functional bathroom <br /> with more closet space and basically leaving everything else in tact. They were not <br /> going to touch the rest of the house and it"s configuration. In conjunction, they had <br /> I <br /> expansion they had proposed since it was a four-bedroom septic and since the <br /> I <br /> existing system was not compliant. He thought this would be a good opportunity to <br /> the system to current Title V system. He was careful; in fact in updating <br /> upgradey � � � g <br /> it to the Title v system...it would be closer to any of the resource area than the <br /> current system. They thought that that would be an improvement. Even.though they <br /> were not increasing any bedrooms, remaining at,the four-bedrooms, there were no <br /> additional residences...Ike thought it would be appropriate to upgrade to the current <br /> Title V standards. <br /> Ms. Warden asked where the old system was located. <br /> Mr. Grotzke pointed out the old system. <br /> Ms. Warden stated that she could not see it. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated that it was super-imposed on the C2 page. Overall it was a <br /> in win situation. His clients were getting a'more functional bedroom without <br /> increasing the number of bedrooms in the residence. In the course of this renovation <br /> they would put in a Title v compliant septic system, which he felt would be better <br /> than the existing pit. That was their proposal. They were hoping that the board <br /> members would agree with them. <br /> F <br /> Mr. Santos asked hair if he was going with a straight Title v and no denitrification <br /> system. <br /> Mr. tarot l e stated that that was correct. They were not increasing the number of <br /> the bedrooms. <br /> Mr. Santos asked what the square footage was on the lot. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that it was 26,700+ square feet. <br /> g <br /> Mr. Ball asked ed if they were omfortabl with the four-bedrooms without a <br /> denitrification. <br /> Mr. Richard-Gray, owner, responded that they were comfortable with that, It was <br /> small house. It was primarily a tiro-bedroom house with two additional bedrooms. <br /> It made good sense at this point in time to being in good practice with thea, which <br /> ll <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.