Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ball clarified that he was referring to the flows that they were using to calculate <br /> the plans. <br /> Mr. Brady felt that Mr. McGrath could address the flow issues. They were trying t <br /> go with the flows under 10,000, GPD. Mr. McGrath presented the flows for the <br /> various entities for the board. They were under the 10,000 CPD. Their calculations <br /> had arrays been under the 10,000 GPD, Maybe and he was speculating completely <br /> here that some of the values of the systems were of the assumption that the bull-run- <br /> valves had been removed. He thought that everyone of the years was going under <br /> that assumption. Unfortunately that was no the fact, which was why in November <br /> the reprised numbers were presented to the hoard because that valve was in place. <br /> That correspondence was set to the hoard with those calculations. <br /> Mr. Santos told Mr. Ball that they needed a motion. First Mr. Santos made a notion <br /> to close it to all public comment. Mr. Ball seconded the notion. Motion passed. <br /> Mr. McGrath interrupted Mr. Santos and asked if they were going t r -i <br /> 1ssue the <br /> schedule and take offthe failures. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that this was for their information only. But, they frau to have his <br /> reports before they could do that. Okay he guessed they were in discussion. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that they needed a motion. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if they needed a motion t go into a discussion. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that that was not corre t. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that they were in discussion. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that they were in discussion. He felt that Mr. Harrington arra Mr. <br /> Ball did a really good job working on all of this. <br /> Mr. Ball interrupted Mr. Santos and asked if he granted a notion for per unit of total <br /> flow. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that that Was correct. He re-iterated that they had dune a heels of a <br /> job. The bottom-line was that they had done other people's work here. They were, <br /> asked to keep it under 10,000 GPD. They had done that total flow. He felt that they <br /> had broken it out as far as they could regarding the ability ofthe systems. <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to grant the applicant flows of 5374 GPD, install the OAR <br /> system and/or if the system is failed th applicant had to concur,with Title V along <br /> with removing the hull run valve for Building A. That would be the same.for <br /> Building D with a flog of 3053 CPD, remove the hull run valve and if the system <br /> was in failure they had to concur with current Title V. Building B would be 1718 <br /> 12 <br />