Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Ms. Grady stated that they would compose a letter and send it to then. Did he know what <br /> it was going to say? <br /> Mr. Ball stated-that they could talk about it. He wanted to include the fine and everything <br /> else. If it was not submitted by March 14 1h, 2005 @ 4:30 PM. <br /> Mr. Harrington asked him if he was going to do anything with Building C and E. <br /> Mr. Ball responded that he was going to require them to submit plans with denitrification. . <br /> IIIc. Ball stated that that was correct. They could decide when they made the decision <br /> then not to do or do it. He wanted that plan there because they were treating the whole <br /> 101000 GPD as a whole. <br /> Mr. Harrington clarified that what he was saying was that the whole property was over <br /> 600 CPI . <br /> Mr. Ball stated that that was correct. Even though the board"s-regulation was vague, let <br /> them fight that battle. <br /> Ms. Grady asked him why it said that there was no denitrification system would he <br /> included. <br /> Mr.,Ball put that because they had not submitted plans with the denitrification. system. He <br /> put that note on there. Not because he wasn't going to require it, <br /> Mr. Harrington re-iterated that their decision now was.going to be to include <br /> denitrification systems for Building C and E. To require the plans to be submitted by the <br /> 1 5 to include denitrification for Buildings A, B 'and D and upgrades to the systems that <br /> have been documented failures that have been documented to the board ofhealth. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that that was correct and hull run valves taken out on Buildings A and D. <br /> M.s. G rron asked to run through this one more time. Building A was in failure or it <br /> wasn't in failure? <br /> Mr. Ball arae a motion that.Building A was in failure with a necessary Title v upgrade, <br /> retrofitted with a denitrification system along with the removal of the bull run valve. The <br /> total flow for that building was assessed at 5374 GPD. Building B was in failure with the <br /> necessary Title V upgrade and retrofitted with a denitrification system. The total flow for <br /> that building was assessed t 1 GPI . Building C was not in failure but they were <br /> I g g required to submit a plan with a denitrification system. The total flow for that building <br /> was assessed at 465 GPD. Building D was in failure with the necessary Title v upgrade <br /> and retr fYitted with a denitrification system along with the removal of the bull run valve. <br /> The total-flow for that building was assessed at 3053 GPD. Building B was not in failure <br /> but they were required to submit a plan with a denitrification system. The total flow for <br /> 6 <br />