Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> Carl Cavossa, of Cavossa Disposal, was recognized and addressed the Board about the process at <br /> UC TS when trucks deliver waste. Mr. Cavossa noted that each truck is given a number that <br /> represents the town from which waste had been collected. The weight of the truck and whether the <br /> load being carried is residential or commercial is recorded by UCRTS. Mr. Cavossa reported that it <br /> would be easier to state the name of the town and whether the waste was residential or commercial <br /> because a giver might Provide the-wrong number. Mr. Cavossa further stated that UCRTS is the <br /> highest priced disposal facility on the Cape. It was clarified that Mashpee regulations require that <br /> commercial and residential be delineated and Mr. Cavossa added that Mashpee is the only town <br /> requiring haulers to do so. A discussion ensued regarding S' MASS contractual obligations for <br /> tonnage and past levied fres. Costs associated with rail transfer nm'nimu ms were also discussed. Sean <br /> Moore, a driver with Allied waste, reported that he has had no problems with the process at UCRTS. <br /> Board members noted that the companies who were missing information were advised to provide <br /> details by 12/23 and Mr. Harrington confirmed that he has received the requested information to allow <br /> release of the 2010 permits. It was recommended that b4r. Harrington meet with each company to <br /> reiterate permit requirements. The Board was in agreement that the permits be issued, with the <br /> exception of Cavossa which will be addressed at the January meeting. Mr. Harrington added that four <br /> of the haulers have violations-for not tipping commercial waste, and had been notified by fax (12/18) <br /> and mai 1 (12/2 1about the meeting. <br /> Peter Amaral, of Cape Waste, provided Mr. Harrington with his recycling numbers. Regarding Cape <br /> waste's missing report for commercial waste, Mr. Amaral stated that the company has only 3 <br /> commercial accounts. Mr. Amaral has spoken with Ms. Laurent about providing estimated <br /> commercial tonnage, noting that it made more sense for him to pick up the waste for a commercial <br /> account when he is in the area picking up his residential accounts. Walter Bednark, who works in the <br /> sales department for Casella, added that his company also has limited commercial accounts and are <br /> currently working on providing monthly tonnage estimates. Ms. Burton emphasized that trash haulers <br /> need to provide the requested information in order to conduct business in town. Mr. Amaral added that <br /> he was in agreement with Mr. Cavossa regarding the cost of using UCRTS but Ms. Burton noted that <br /> use of the facility is a requirement in Mashpee. A representative from one Pointe Horne Curators <br /> questioned her company's need for additional information to which lair. Harrington responded that he <br /> had previously requested corrected recycling numbers. It was reported that Bean Fina planned to meet <br /> with Mr. Harrington to provided addition l information. <br /> 14r. Cavossa recommended that the Board review Mashpee's contract with S SASS since estimating <br /> commercial numbers may be a violation of the contract. Board members noted that Ms. Laurent <br /> oversees the contract. Ms. Laurent has been working on a solution but roust work through UCRTS and <br /> the Selectmen since it will affect existing contracts with S 111 S and the railroad. Mr. Harrington <br /> added that variances with conditions, from the Mashpee Regulations, could be issued to companies <br /> based on the number of commercial accounts or tonnage. Board'members were in agreement that they <br /> want to ensure hauler compliance and reasonable regulations and encouraged the haulers to provide <br /> feedback. Mr. Cavossa suggested that it would be easier for haulers if they were allowed to dump <br /> recycling at UC TS and if the commercial fees were more competitive. <br /> Ms. Burton questioned whether or not Mr, Harrington had any recommendations for levying fines or <br /> proceeding with issuing permits to the four haulers who have not reported commercial waste. Mr. <br /> Harrington stated that the Board has the ability to levy a fine of up to $1000 for violations and that a <br /> previous hauler-was fined $500 for the year for not reporting commercial waste. <br />