My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/13/2012 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
6/13/2012 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2018 5:11:26 PM
Creation date
3/28/2018 2:02:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ibb <br /> screen on the front door, the mop sink in the bathroom, and satisfactory completion of the ServSafe <br /> class. Lucy Burton seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> I. Sign Warrants. •Board members signed the warrants. <br /> . Review/Approve BOH Public Session Minutes: May 23, 2012. <br /> Approval of the minutes was continued to the next meeting with full Board of Health attendance. <br /> . Request for Title V Variance: 1ikon Grove. <br /> Matt costa, representing Martha Knapp of 18 Wilsons. Grove, introduced himself to the Board. <br /> Mr. costa stated that he is requesting Local Upgrade Approval for 2 specific waivers. The first <br /> variance would be a One-foot reduction to groundwater from 5 feet to 4 feet. The second waiver <br /> would be a right side line setback waiver from 10 feet to 6 feet. This is a very small lot, and a waiver <br /> is required to the right side property line setback. It is mitigated by the installation of a poly vapor <br /> barrier. This will provide adequate protection to the property net door, and provide equivalent <br /> protection as if the full setbacks were being ret. <br /> Matt costa commented that a certified notice was sent to the abutter at 20 Wilsons Grove. Mr. Costa. <br /> submitted a copy of the letter along with the certified return receipt to the Board of Health. <br /> Mr. costa stated that he originally had filed with the Board anticipating working together with the <br /> neighbors to eliminate a retaining wall situation, where two retaining walls would be right net to each <br /> other. Mr. Costa commented that the neighbors have a proposed design for their septic that has not <br /> been installed. <br /> Matt Costa stated that he informed Ms. Snapp to file with the Board of Health main, and this time <br /> notify the-abutters by certified mail to protect her interest. Mr. costa commented that there has been <br /> no change to the plan only the procedure. <br /> Cindy Mandeville and Patricia Senville, owners of 20 Wilsons Grove, introduced themselves to the. <br /> Board.- <br /> Ms. Mandeville and,Ms. Senville commented that they are concerned about the flow of water onto <br /> their property once the system is installed at 18 Wilsons Grove. Ms. Mandeville and Ms. Senville <br /> 5 <br /> stated that the installer, Don Swire, for 18 Wilsons Grove informed them that they would have a <br /> definite grater situation once the system is installed. Glen Harrington corn mented that downspouts <br /> and gutters are to be kept away from the septic systems and provide a common catch basin in the <br /> middle to direct the water back into the ground. This will-help prevent ponding in one spot which <br /> would back p into the house. <br /> Lucy Burton com rated that Matt costa, the engineer, designed a plan with very little space to <br /> upgrade the failed system in accordance with Maximum Feasible-Compliance. Ms. Burton stated that <br /> Mr. Costa is doing the hest he can to design a system based on the constraints presented to him so <br /> that there will not be any issues. <br /> Matt Costa commented that the gall is a retaining wall. This wall is fined with a poly barrier to prevent <br /> any seepage of the wastewater coming through that gall. In order to meet the requirements of Title <br /> V, the wall is being added to raise the grade in the backyard because of the shared low area. A <br /> retaining wall needs to be installed to account for the change in grade. <br /> Mr. costa commented that in this situation there are two designs that have been configured so that <br /> they can stand on their own. They can be done without the benefit of grading over the property line. If <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.