Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> DECEMBER 13, 2417 <br /> Mr. Mendoza provided the Board with the specific requirements under the Architectural <br /> Access Board Code (AAB), and his'research for this particular case. He proceeded to give <br /> a brief training on the AAB and noted that the ADA is Federal Law and more strict. Mike <br /> said he's in charge of enforcing the Massachusetts Law. He read allowed the numbered <br /> requirements listed under Section 521 CMR that detail the descriptions of door openings <br /> and floor space. He told the Board to referback to Options A & B, which shows the door <br /> doesn't meet the handicapped accessibility requirements.He asked the Board to reconsider <br /> the application because the original plan complies with handicapped accessibility <br /> requirements. <br /> Mr. Blaisdell said that the Commissioner has explained the details of this case,and the only <br /> way to accommodate the handicapped bathroom for this particular property is to get a <br /> Variance because there's no other physical way for someone in a wheelchair to access the <br /> bathroom and shower area. Mr. Blaisdell said he believes the applicant did his due <br /> diligence to come up with a solution so a Variance would not be required. He worked with <br /> the Building Commissioner on several options to avoid a Variance. They corrected the <br /> issue of a Variance but they did not meet the code for the handicapped accessibility. He <br /> agreed that this is a very special circumstance with a hardship involved. He recommended <br /> that the Board reopen this case. <br /> Mr. Goldstein has reviewed the plans and the State requirements and he agreed it's a very <br /> minor Variance request. The bathroom design is minimal as possible to make it <br /> handicapped accessible and is just large enough to accommodate the needs required. He <br /> said the lots in this area are very small, and this Variance is very minor. <br /> Mr. Gould said that this is an overwhelming hardship for this case, and he believes that the <br /> applicant being the caregiver should be able to live with his family. He said this Variance <br /> should be granted because of the hardship involved and the options displayed by the <br /> Building Inspector. <br /> Mr. Goldstein made a motion to approve the Variance for 16 Bluff Avenue Owner,William <br /> J. Peros requests a Variance of the side yard setback under §174-31 of the Zoning Bylaws <br /> to allow for construction of a 6' x 13' addition to an existing single-family dwelling on <br /> property located in an R-3 Zoning District, and Popponesset Overlay District, (Map 112 <br /> Parcel 93), Mashpee, MA. The Board issues a Variance in the amount of 1.5 ft. right side <br /> yard setback, and under the following conditions; The Board has determined that the <br /> applicant meets all the conditions of a Variance under Mass General Law 40A Section 10. <br /> Certified Plot Plan—Proposed Addition, 16 Bluff Avenue,Mashpee,MA 02649. Prepared <br /> by: Cape & Islands Engineering, Summerfield Park, 800 Falmouth Rd., Suite 301C, <br /> Mashpee, MA., Drawn by: JB, Check by: MC, Date: Sept. 18, 2017, Sheet 1 of 1, Signed <br /> by: Matthew J. Costa, No. 52282, Professional Land Surveyor. Also includes all Town <br /> department comments previously read into the record, and the information packet supplied <br /> by the Building Commissioner including the AAB guidelines for handicapped <br /> accessibility, a plan showing hardship of the handicapped accessible bathroom that meets <br /> the AAB guidelines for the 15 ft., setback requirements, and a hardship of the odd shaped <br /> lot. <br /> 10 <br />