Laserfiche WebLink
Il lU11N�.`r <br /> Ta wn of Mashpee <br /> o F�. 16 C�rrc�.t d�r�r. r�r�cl <br /> °Yef z Ir�s)t ice, �7r.ss c1�«s{tt•s 9649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> FINDING-2017-66 <br /> Michael Cusack Doc. #: 1023639 <br /> 46 Quail Hollow Road Ctf. #: 179015 <br /> (Map 58 Parcels 54 & 55) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on November 1, 2017 by Owner, Michael Cusack, requesting <br /> a Written Finding under §174-17 and §174-33 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for a kitchen <br /> and living room addition to an existing single-family dwelling on property located in an R- <br /> 5 Zoning District, 46 Quail Hollow Road, (Map 58 Parcel(s) 54 and 55), Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A.Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on November 10, 2017 and November 17, <br /> 2017 a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §6 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning Bylaws. <br /> The Board received a letter dated December 6, 2017 requesting a continuance until <br /> February 14,2018 hearings for their renovation project. The Board read their letter into the <br /> record at the December 13, 2017 hearings. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at which time the following members of the Board of <br /> Appeals were present;Acting Chairman, William Blaisdell,Board Members, Ron Bonvie, <br /> Dom DeBarros, and Scott Goldstein, and Associate Member, Brad Pittsley. <br /> Mr.Kevin Kieler,Permit Solutions represented the homeowners for the project. He <br /> said after the last hearing there were minor changes made on the layout of the house. The <br /> first reason is that the size of the addition was more costly, and the second is because the <br /> furniture layout on the inside of the home is too close to the fireplace and it was not to <br /> code. Mr. Kieler said that the Variances that were granted at the September 2017 meeting <br /> will still apply because none of the setbacks have changed, only the proposed addition has <br /> changed. He provided revised plans that depict what was approved back in September and <br /> what was improved in the "no-build" zone. The amount of construction for the addition <br /> was reduced by 216.75 sq. ft. which is noted on the plan in black, and the new proposed is <br /> outlined in red. The only difference is that the wall that is situated along the location of the <br /> deck will be pushed out 2 ft. and will align with the existing deck, and will be compliant <br /> with fire codes for the fire place.The layout and the setbacks that were previously approved <br /> have not changed. <br /> 1 <br />