Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br /> o T oJ Ylashpee <br /> 1G.Crcat jl c?rk',1C 0({N,'0 lh <br /> blas{t{7re,?XIrts achiistis.(7�(� ,J. <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br /> V-2017-67 <br /> Michael Cusack Doc. #: 1023639 <br /> 46 Quail Hollow Road Ctf. #: 179015 <br /> (Map 58 Parcels 54 & 55) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on November 1, 2017 by Owner, Michael Cusack, requesting <br /> a Variance of the front and side setbacks under §174-31 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for <br /> a kitchen and living room addition to an existing single-family dwelling on property located <br /> in an R-5 Zoning District,46 Quail Hollow Road, (Map 58 Parcel(s) 54 and 55), Mashpee, <br /> MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A.Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on November 10, 2017 and November 17, <br /> 2017 a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §6 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning By-laws. <br /> The Board received a letter dated December 6, 2017 requesting a continuance until <br /> February 14,2018 hearings for their renovation project. The Board read their letter into the <br /> record at the December 13, 2017 hearings. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at which time the following members of the Board of <br /> Appeals were present; Acting Chairman,William Blaisdell, Board Members, Ron Bonvie, <br /> Dom DeBarros, and Scott Goldstein, and Associate Member, Brad Pittsley. <br /> Mr. Kevin Kieler,Permit Solutions represented the homeowners for the project. He <br /> said after the last hearing there were minor changes made on the layout of the house. The <br /> first reason is that the size of the addition was more costly, and the second is because the <br /> fiu-niture layout on the inside of the home is too close to the fireplace and it was not to <br /> code. He said that the Variances that were granted at the September 2017 meeting will still <br /> apply because none of the setbacks have changed, only the proposed addition has changed. <br /> He provided revised plans that depict what was approved back in September and what was <br /> improved in the "no-build"zone. The amount of construction for the addition was reduced <br /> by 216.75 sq. ft. which is noted on the plan in black, and the new proposed is outlined in <br /> red. <br /> 1 <br />