Laserfiche WebLink
TC31<m of Mashpee <br /> ' 16 Creat d eco!padA,.orib <br /> �7ii ic+ QS�t�7C.'B,.t C1SSC7CjliLS(.t(S <br /> 02649 <br /> MASHPEE.ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> FINDING-2017-22 <br /> Scott W. Thorp and Linda D. Thorp Bk. #: 30456 <br /> 62 Riverside Road Pg.#: 58' <br /> Map 119 Parcel 136 Doc. #20930 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on April 13,2017 by Scott Thorp requesting a Written Finding <br /> under §174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for construction of an attached garage with <br /> a bedroom above on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, Map 119 Parcel 136, <br /> Mashpee,MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A.Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise,a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee,on April 28,2017 and May 5,2017 a copy of <br /> which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §6 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning By-laws. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at which time the following members of the Board of Appeals <br /> were present; Chairman, Jonathan Furbush; Vice Chairman, William Blaisdell, Board <br /> Members,Ron Bonvie,Dom DeBarros,and Scott Goldstein,and Associate Members,Brad <br /> Pittsley and Norman J. Gould. Also present was Building Commissioner, Michael <br /> Mendoza. <br /> Mr. Scott Thorp represented himself for the garage project. He submitted the <br /> petition application while in the process of purchasing the home and wanted to meet the <br /> filing deadline. He provided the Board with the plot plan of his property that depicts the <br /> existing and proposed project which consists of a 23 ft. by 24 ft, two bay garage with a <br /> bedroom above. <br /> The Board had a discussion regarding the lot coverage being over the 20% <br /> requirement. They suggested that the applicant try and reduce the lot coverage by possibly <br /> removing the shed.The Board is trying to set a precedence for future applications and keep <br /> the lot coverage below 20%. <br /> Mr.Mendoza mentioned to the Board that when the building permit is submitted to <br /> the Building Department,the as-built foundation plan should show the lot coverage. <br /> 1 <br />