Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals Minutes - September 23, 1998 4. <br /> Mr. Slavinsky remarked that nitrogen lowering is based on the area of the lot, not the <br /> frontage and, further, the Cape Cod Commission standard for a three-bedroom house is <br /> one acre of land. <br /> Mr. Govoni moved to take the application under advisement. Mr. Nelson seconded. All <br /> agreed. <br /> Richard T. Henshall -Requests a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for <br /> permission to vary the frontage setback and lot coverage requirements on property located <br /> in an R-3 zoning district at 24 Captains Row (Map 90 Block 54)Mashpee, MA. <br /> Richard T. Henshall -Requests a Special Permit under Section 174-20 of the Zoning By- <br /> laws for permission to demolish an existing structure and construct a single family <br /> dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 24 Captains Row(Map 90 Block <br /> 54)Mashpee,MA. <br /> Members sitting: Edward M. Govoni, James E. Regan III and Robert G. Nelson. <br /> t <br /> David Sanicki of Cape&Islands Engineering represented the applicant stating that the <br /> proposed front and side setbacks of the new construction will not be any closer to the <br /> pavement than the existing house. The cesspool will be removed and a Title V septic <br /> system will be installed. He further stated that there are conservation, wetlands, flood <br /> plains, coastal bank and topographic considerations. The lot includes an eighteen-foot <br /> drop in elevation from one side of the lot to the other. Conservation Commission has <br /> approved the project, subject to Zoning Board of Appeals' approval, Mr, Sanicki said <br /> that the request for a 1.6%lot coverage variance includes the new house, porch and the <br /> y <br /> deck. <br /> l <br /> The following details were listed by Mr. Sanicki: <br /> • the new structure will be no closer to the lot lines than the existing structure, <br /> • the existing structure has been there for 30 years. <br /> i <br /> • the new structure will not be any more detrimental to the neighborhood. <br /> • there are coastal and topographic considerations that necessitate the variance. <br /> 0 the installation of a Title V septic system will be an environmental improvement. <br /> is <br /> i' No comments were received from abutters. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Nelson moved to grant the Variance frontage setback of 18 feet and lot coverage of <br /> i! 1,6%, subject to criteria 1-4 and findings 1,2 (property fronts on a river and is impacted <br /> by wetlands) and 3 (without relief the lot could not be used for a residence). Mr. Govoni <br /> l <br /> seconded. All agreed. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br />