My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/28/1996 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
8/28/1996 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2018 5:04:12 PM
Creation date
4/11/2018 11:04:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
permitted in the Cluster By-Law. " And the Board concluded <br /> unanimously, by the way, that this development of registered land <br /> on the Cluster Zoning principle will (quote) , . . .Will fulfill the <br /> spirit and intent of the Mashpee Zoning By-Law (end quote) • " So <br /> by this General Finding in February of 1964, the ZBA completed <br /> its role, it finished. It has fulfilled its role under the 164 <br /> Zoning By-Law. Then. . . then pursuant to that 164 By-Law, in July <br /> of 164, five months later, Popponesset Corporation was . . .was the <br /> predecessor to New Seabury, executed a deed which conveyed a <br /> portion of this registered land to the Town of Mashpee and it ' s <br /> in the deed, a copy of which I had for you. . . I think Mr. Henchy <br /> showed it to you, has a very long list, very detailed. Twenty- <br /> nine (29) sections on the left column, how many units in each <br /> section and how many commercial square feet in each section. <br /> That ' s only in the deed, none of that is in the February Decision <br /> of the Board of Appeals . That ' s very important . Uh. . . there is <br /> no specific listing of dwelling units or commercial square <br /> footage in the Facts and Decision made by the Board of Appeals in <br /> February of ' 64 . . .very, very important . Uh. . . and the reason for <br /> that is because that wasn' t the function of the Board of Appeals . <br /> The function of the Board of Appeals as stated specifically in <br /> the By-Law was to make a general finding that this cluster had no <br /> more than three (3) units per acre, had the sufficient <br /> amount . . .had. . .had no more than the maximum number of square feet <br /> and that this fulfilled the spirit and intent of the By-Law. <br /> Instead it was the July 164 deed that listed all those specific <br /> uh. . .units and specific square footage that . . . that was changed by <br /> vote of the Town Meeting in 1990 with the contract that the <br /> Selectmen signed in 1995 . <br /> Therefore, it ' s proper that the parties to the May 1995 <br /> Agreement can only be the exact same people who did the deed, New <br /> Seabury Corporation and the Town of Mashpee, through its Board of <br /> Selectmen. Not the Board of Appeals, because the Board of <br /> Appeals wasn' t involved in the deed. This. . . the 1995 uh. . .uh. . . <br /> Modification Agreement is not an amendment of a land use Special <br /> Permit over which the ZBA has jurisdiction. What we' re <br /> doing—what we did in 1995, in the 1990 . . .what the Town Meeting <br /> did was a Modification of the Restrictions in the July 164 deed, <br /> which didn' t change the total density of three (3) per acre, or <br /> the commercial square footage, it merely reallocated between <br /> sections . And this was voted by Town Meeting. Town Meeting <br /> wanted to do this . It voted in 1990 . And then contract and. . . <br /> the Selectmen contracted to do this as authorized by Town Meeting <br /> in 1994 . . . 5 (1995) . The reason the Town did this by the way, <br /> just historically, for those of you who may not remember, is that <br /> there. . . some of these. . . these four hundred units that were being <br /> moved over were going to be in. . . in the old section <br /> was right <br /> ht <br /> next to South Cape Beach. And the Town didn' t want units there. <br /> It wanted to move these units away from South Cape Beach and what <br /> was then a designated ACEC, area of critical environmental <br /> concern. So, the Town wanted to move this . . . these units over. <br /> And in addition, as some of you may remember, the Town received <br /> k -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.