My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/28/1996 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
8/28/1996 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2018 5:04:12 PM
Creation date
4/11/2018 11:04:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
restrictions. In order for a town to modify and release or <br /> change or let go of any interest in land that it has . And that ' s <br /> where the 1954 Deed was . Special Town. . .not Special Town <br /> Meeting, Town Meeting actions required that Board of Selectmen, <br /> Conservation Commission, uh. . . a uh. . . a Council on Aging, any town <br /> body that manages or controls a parcel of land can' t simply vote <br /> to deed it away to someone or could the Board of Selectmen do <br /> anything with the use of land or a town do anything with a use of <br /> land, a Town Meeting vote is required. There are numerous cases <br /> on that and a Statute right on that point . So that in order for <br /> the Town to do anything vis-a-vis, changing the way these <br /> development rights were structured, Town Meeting action was <br /> absolutely required. And in 1971 that apparently happened, in <br /> 1990 it happened again. What I 'm saying to the Board is Town <br /> Meeting action (inaudible) that group isn' t enough. It ' s not the <br /> Town Meeting that is charged by Statute or by Mashpee Zoning By- <br /> Law with finding a particular configuration is consistent with <br /> public good. . . it ' s not the Town Meeting or the Board of Selectmen <br /> that is charged with finding that particular configuration of the <br /> development will not derogate from the intent and purposes of the <br /> by-law. This Board by Statute and this Board by application of <br /> the Mashpee Zoning By-Laws is the only Board that can do that . <br /> And if you look at the 1995 Agreement, the Board of Selectmen <br /> purport to (inaudible) the Board of Appeals . They simply say, <br /> The Town of Mashpee hereby authorizes four hundred and twenty- <br /> five (425) dwelling units to be erected in Section 5 . This <br /> includes being deemed by the Mashpee Board of Selectmen to be of <br /> substantial compliance with the New Seabury Special Permit. The <br /> Board of Selectmen have no business deciding what ' s in compliance <br /> with the Special Permit or not. The exclusive jurisdiction for <br /> that is with the relief courts . Uh. . .They say the same thing <br /> about three hundred and forty thousand (340, 000) square feet of <br /> commercial space. They say that the Town of Mashpee authorizes <br /> three hundred and forty thousand (340, 000) thousand square feet <br /> of area be devoted to the commercial uses in addition to <br /> recreational uses in Section 5 . This increase being deemed by <br /> Mashpee Board of Selectmen to be of substantial requirement <br /> within the New Seabury Special Permit . The Board of Selectmen <br /> simply have no authority to make those determinations . They have <br /> the right to carry out a vote of the Town Meeting authorizing <br /> them to convey an interest in land or change it . But they have <br /> no right and no power to make factual findings which are a <br /> predicate under the Zoning By-Law to that particular conveyance <br /> uh. . .being able to be carried out . <br /> Lastly, and. . . and this is very important for us to touch <br /> upon. Mr. Fox has made the assertion that any subsequent <br /> purchaser of the property would have to comply with the <br /> restrictions that the Board of Selectmen has imposed upon <br /> uh. . . the land in the Agreement . Uh. . .That ' s just flatly not <br /> true. And the reason that that ' s not true is because this <br /> Agreement hasn' t been recorded. The Agreement isn' t required to <br /> be recorded. Uh. . . It says that it may be recorded in the <br /> -12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.