My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/27/2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
>
4/27/2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2018 5:02:25 PM
Creation date
4/11/2018 11:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
ZBA Decision
Meeting Date
04/27/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Town of Mashpee <br /> 16 Greal Aeck load Arlh. <br /> "ll�EN Washpee,Massacli(Isetts 02649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br /> V-2016-17 <br /> Vladislav and Viktoriya Vilkomir Doc. 281468 <br /> 3 Mizzenmast(Map 125 Parcel 240) Ctf. 207830 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on March 25, 2016 by Vladislav and Viktoriya Vilkomir <br /> requesting a Variance of the rear setback to allow for construction of an in-ground pool <br /> under §174-31 of the Zoning Bylaws on property located in an R-3 Zoning District, (Map <br /> 125 Parcel 240), Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on April 1, 2016 and April 8, 2016 a copy of <br /> which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §10 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning By-laws. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday,April 27, 2016 at which time the following members of the Board of Appeals <br /> were sitting in on this hearing; Vice Chairman, William Blaisdell, Board Members, Ron <br /> Bonvie, Doan DeBarros, Scott Goldstein, and Associate Member, Brad Pittsley. <br /> Attorney, Mark Gildea represented the homeowners for the pool application. He <br /> provided the Board a narrative packet that included the plot plan of the property,photos of <br /> the back yard, and a list of other properties that were granted similar variance relief for <br /> their pools, sheds, dwellings and garage projects. <br /> Attorney Gildea said the plan depicts a 10 foot setback from the lot line to the edge <br /> of the pool, and would require a 5 foot Variance from the 15 foot setback requirement. The <br /> pool size will be 36' x 15'. Due to the size and shape of the lot and the location of the <br /> house, there is no other place to put the pool without the variance relief. Also on the plan <br /> depicts a fence and landscaping that runs along the abutting property at 92 Waterline Drive <br /> South owned by the Shulmans. Both neighbors thought the fence was located on each <br /> other's property. Attorney Gildea said his client had the lot surveyed and it was found that <br /> the fence is located on the Shulman's property. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.