My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/22/1992 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
>
1/22/1992 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2022 10:31:22 AM
Creation date
4/11/2018 2:21:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
ZBA Decision
Meeting Date
01/22/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TOWN <br /> nT� l Z <br /> l'r,� <br /> olvi2 of � IISh�JPP <br /> P. 0. BOX 1108 (�` ��n/1(� <br /> n�eLe� MASHPEE. MA 02649 ry Vv �f LECABOARD OF APPEALS FEB 3 1992 <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A VARIANCE <br /> RE: Steven R. Ball for a Variance V-92-6 <br /> A Petition was filed by Steven R. Ball of Mashpee, Massachusetts <br /> for a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission <br /> to vary the side line setback requirement in an R-3 zoning district on <br /> property located at 53 Amy Brown Road (Map 109, Block 1) Mashpee, MA. <br /> (Owner of record: Richard E. Ball) . <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee <br /> on January 3 and January 10, 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto <br /> and made a part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town <br /> Hall on Wednesday, January 22, 1992 at 7:30 P.M. at which time the <br /> following members of the Board of Appeals were present and acting <br /> throughout: William J. Hanrahan, Michael A. Makunas and John J. Friel. <br /> Mr. Ball represented the Petition and explained that he had <br /> wanted to repair a 9' x 6' old shed and filed with Conservation who <br /> approved replacing the shed with an 8' x 12' structure located 15' <br /> further back on the land. Mr. Ball constructed the new shed 2.9' <br /> from the property line. He was informed by the Building Inspector that <br /> this shed should have been constructed 15' from the property line and <br /> have a valid building permit. Opposition was received from a direct <br /> abutter and the Town Planner stating that the lot in question was an <br /> illegal subdivision. <br /> The Board determined that the Petitioner failed to meet the <br /> conditions necessary for the granting of a Variance. There was not <br /> sufficient evidence presented showing that the shape or topography <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.