My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2008 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Minutes
>
11/13/2008 ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2018 5:07:01 PM
Creation date
4/13/2018 2:15:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
was a poor solution for wastewater treatment because it is not properly circulated,causing <br /> deterioration. <br /> Mr. Marcelli also reported the success of the revitalization of Quashnet's courtyard, located near the <br /> library. Mr. Marcelli shared a"Volunteers Make it Happen" flyer that highlighted who worked on the <br /> project. <br /> Land Stewards Update <br /> Ms. Kane announced that her daughter resigned her role as an area coordinator, which leaves just one <br /> coordinator left. Ms. Kane indicated disappointment at the lack of communication with the <br /> Conservation Department noting a nonresponsiveness to volunteer's concerns. Mr. Baker added that <br /> Jim Leonard also resigned, and had requested that volunteers contact the Conservation Department <br /> directly. However,the volunteers continue to express their concerns to Mr. Leonard. A report of trash <br /> being found at the bog shared with Falmouth was reported and the DPW will be picking up the trash <br /> and installing a gate to close off the area. Mr. Baker has encouraged the Conservation Agent to <br /> maintain open communication with the volunteers as well as offering an occasional pat on the back. <br /> The Environmental Coalition would like to manage the program again, and the issue will be discussed <br /> further at a meeting in January. Ms. Kane added that state law requires conservation areas to be cared <br /> for. The Chair asked if the Committee wishes to draft a letter of deep concern to Agent McManus, <br /> copying the Town Manager,the Conservation Commission and the Board of Selectmen,regarding <br /> what will be done to remedy the program,with a request to have a prepared response for the newt <br /> Environmental Oversight Committee meeting. <br /> Motion made by Mr. Baker to draft a letter to the Conservation Agent addressing the <br /> Committee's deep concern about the program. Motion seconded by Mr. Marcelli. All voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> ENSR <br /> Mr. Baker liked the addition of wet weather monitoring at a cost of$4,250 but felt that the bog <br /> sampling would be a challenge since there would be no prior knowledge of a discharge. Mr. Baker <br /> also expressed interest in trying to fund the study so that it can be completed in one year and suggested <br /> seeking emergency funds from the Finance Committee since Santuit Pond is considered a health <br /> hazard by the Board of Health. Mr. Baker sent an email to the departments involved with the study, <br /> receiving a response from the Town Manager that suggested the scope of work had been changed by <br /> the Committee necessitating re-advertisement for the project. Mr. Baker responded that the Committee <br /> recommend to the Board of Selectmen to proceed with the original $51,500 proposal for the study, <br /> without including the extra tests. The Chair asked about the timing of the study to which Mr. Baker <br /> responded that his preference was to initiate the study in April, rather than wait a full year. If the study <br /> could not begin until May, Mr. Baker would recommend that necessary testing be completed the <br /> following April. The Chair asked if any members had concerns regarding the abilities or scope of the <br /> proposal. Committee members felt that Mr. Mitchell was highly qualified, with strong <br /> recommendations. Mr. Theis expressed concern about remediation and the need for funding. The <br /> Chair added that he was impressed that funding options for remediation were included in the proposal. <br /> Mr. Marcelli added that he liked ENSR's inclusion of what would be feasible and what would be cost <br /> effective for remediationplans. The Chair further inquired if the Committee believed that,through the <br /> evaluation process,the members felt that ENSR was the most qualified based on all three proposals. <br /> Members confirmed that the proposals were reviewed based on technical merits and feel strongly that, <br /> based on the meeting with ENSR,they demonstrated an understanding of the problem and presented a <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.