My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/20/1998 FINANCE COMMITTEE Minutes
>
1/20/1998 FINANCE COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2018 5:02:13 PM
Creation date
4/23/2018 2:51:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/20/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
s <br /> Iver. Whritenour stated that he has a few points he would like to make on the F99 Revenues <br /> that will tie in with the issue of Free Cash: <br /> • Total state revenue is up$200,000. <br /> • Total non-property tax revenue is down$200,000. <br /> • The detail of the levy calculation is on Page 2 of the report. <br /> Mr. Golub questioned why the Ambulance receipts are ofd Mr. Whritenour stated that the <br /> ambulance receipts are not ofd This is the amount of ambulance receipts that are used to � <br /> supplement the budget. Last year, an ambulance was purchased so that it why it was high. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Golub questioned Mr. Whritenour on the item under Local Revenues called Overlay <br /> Surplus-CIP and what it was. Mr. Whritenour stated that those were funds used for the <br /> overlay surplus to support specific projects such as mapping. <br /> Mr. Golub questioned lir, Whritenour on the item under Local Revenues called Available <br /> Bond Proecds. Mr. Whritenour stated that those were the funds that were devoted to the <br /> C.I.P. that were left over from previous construction projects. Mr. Cobb questioned if the <br /> stabilization fund would be included in this. Mr. Whritenour stated that the stabilization <br /> fund is noted on the second page of the report. The reason that the stabilization is not in <br /> there is because they are specific budget items and stabilization goes in a different section—a <br /> section for offsetting the entire budget in a general sense. <br /> Mr. Whritenour reviewed the second page of the report which included the Local Property <br /> Tax revenue which consists of the Base Levy,plus 2-112%Increase,Estimated New <br /> Growth,the Levy Limit Inside Prop. 2-1/2,the Debt Exclusions,the Cape Cod Commission, <br /> the Total Levy Limit,Total Adjusted Levy,and Total General Government. Mr. Whritenour <br /> noted that the key in these items is that the Total Levy Limit.is$21,174,942 and last year's <br /> levy was$18,684,477; so the increase is$2,490,465 which is 13.3%. <br /> He noted that taking all the items combined in revenues,you get a total of$27,922,938.59 <br /> and comparing those against the total budget request in the amount of$30,350,645--add to <br /> that the budget overlay in the amount of$300,000--then the total needed to raise i <br /> $30,650,645 and that is$2,727,706 over what we have to raise if you do a 13-1/2%tax <br /> increase and you would stili be$2,727,706 short. He noted that a key point is that at this <br /> stage of the budget,he has the amount of zero in the Funds used for Offset. when the <br /> budget is finalized,it will not be zero. <br /> Mr. Whritenour commented that in F9 ,there was approximately$1,000,000 of <br /> stabilization fund used just to buy down for the Proposition 2-1 levy limit. In addition to <br /> that,there was$1.8 million used of some resources to offset the tax levy for a total of <br /> $210783M00- He noted that he would like to point out two key item: <br /> 1 we need to have funds available from free cash and other sources to address the <br /> issue of a 13%tax increase. <br /> We still have to address the issue of the 13P , of stabilization that was in <br /> last year's budget just to get it down. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.