Laserfiche WebLink
+r#n <br /> { <br /> Article 21 <br /> a lir. Fudala reviewed Article 21 as it pertains to zoning neap changes. He noted the goal of <br /> creating an alternate route to Great Neck Road by'hanging 2 residential lots to industrial. <br /> He stated the Planning Board supports the article. <br /> ■ Mr. Avis asked how nearby residents feel about the issue. Mr. Fudala noted the presence of <br /> a buffer of town lana between the nearby development and the proposed passage, 1 . <br /> Mason observed the passage's close proximity to the 'Town Cemetery. <br /> 0 Mr. Avis asked if new road would warrant traffic signals. Mr. Fudala predicted there would <br /> not be enough traffic to add signals. <br /> ■ Mr. Avis asked if the owners ofthe industrial park approved of rezoning effort. fir. Fudala <br /> indicated the owner had their engineer present a preliminary plan.for the project. Mr. <br /> Fudala stated that abutters will receive public notice in newspapers. Ms. Mason suggested <br /> providing individual notice to abutters as well. Ir. Fudala agreed. <br /> ■ Committee discussed details of plain layout. Mr. Gasi r asked what a voter approval would <br /> accomplish. Mr. Fudala confirmed article seeks to male the land in question zoned for <br /> industrial use. Mr. Avis questioned the impact on the tax revenue. Ms. Mason confirmed <br /> that the rate is the same. lair. Fudala noted that industrial land is valued higher so more <br /> revenue would he generated. <br /> ■ Mr. Avis asked-ifCommittee could recommend mend approval prior to public hearing. Ms. <br /> Mason confirmed this option, with any recommendation based upon current information. <br /> ■ lair. Gasior suggested the article was worthwhile to recommend based on its financial <br /> impact to the town. <br /> Article 2 <br /> ■ Committee reviewed details of Article 22 to reduce setbacks in town center. lir. Avis <br /> asked if there were any plans to build. Mr. Fudala indicated a developer had submitted <br /> plans for a 40B project. <br /> Article 23 <br /> F <br /> Committee mittee reviewed details ofArticle 23 as it pertains to accessory apartment bylaws. lir. <br /> Fudala noted there is an issue with the interpretation of the current bylaw. He noted the <br /> goal of the article is to keep apartments internal to the main structure. <br /> Article 2 <br /> ■ Committee reviewed Article 24 regarding parking space sizes. Mr. Fudala noted there are <br /> no major financial repercussions for this article. <br /> Article 2 <br /> ■ <br /> Committee discussed Article 26 as it pertains to legal issues in the permit process. Mr. <br /> Fdla noted the goal is to clarify zoning bylaws on nonconforming lots. <br /> Article 2 <br /> Committee reviewed Article 27 as it pertains to cluster subdivision boundaries. lis. Mason � <br /> noted the to will stand to gain financially through improved property. <br /> i Article 3 <br /> ■ Committee reviewed Article 30 as it pertains to Overlay zone submitted by petition. Mr. <br /> Fudala clariffled that the article seeks to add certain retail uses with limited foot traffic. <br /> ■ Mr. Arris asked if the bylaw change would alloy a retail.store with road frontage, given the <br /> newtown access road. Mt. Fudala acknowledged the possibility. <br /> ■ Mr. Hutchinson asked if the planning l and supported the article. Mr.-Fudala noted the <br /> board had not yet received the article for review. <br /> ■ lir. Avis noted the landowner will benefit from zoning changes as landowner could chane <br /> higher rents for road frontage. <br /> Road Tarin Article <br /> x � <br />