Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> P $o 657 _ <br /> [1 0643 • - Public <br /> Ma hp e <br /> 508-539-1435 FAX 508-5,319-1 437 Library <br /> To: David Burton From; Helene DeFoe <br /> Fac: o -477-8687 Pages: 4 <br /> Phone:. Date: 10/8/2003 <br /> Re: Sandwich Library leaving CLAMS Ccs <br /> 0 Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please reply El Please.Recycle <br /> The Sandwich Library has recently notified CLAMS that they will be leaving the Network on ..duly 1, <br /> 2004 to join the Old colony Network. I'm faxing you an article, which appeared in the Sandwich <br /> Enterprise announcing their withdrawal. There area number of factual inaccuracies in the article. The <br /> decision was presented as primarily a financial decision. If you read the article,the chair of the trustees <br /> states that local control was the big issue. The S in CLAMS represents sharing, a concept, which <br /> Sandwich has had difficulty with. Last year, they borrowed 18,000 from other CLAMS members bers but <br /> lent only 6,000 items in return. For years, they have restricted their bestsellers, videos and DVDs to <br /> local request for Sandwich residents only. The membership democratically voted to do away with local <br /> request status and voted to standardize fines and loan periods for patron convenience. This was not a <br /> decision imposed by the CLAMS staff, but a member driven decision to improve services for all. I'm <br /> happy to say that we have,se n an improver rrt'in-how quickly requests are filled without the local <br /> restriction. Sandwich was unhappy.with that vote and opted to leave the Network. <br /> Ms Vander }� <br /> ander I also encourages residents who want to continue to use CLAMS to get a card from a <br /> CLAMS library. While it.is true that we have to honor requests for cards from any Massachusetts <br /> resident, it seems inappropriate for the chair of their Trustees to suggest this route in,a newspaper <br /> article. In other words,get your card next door and use services we arena wiIIing to pay for. <br /> The fees structure is based on how much demand you place on t1� system. I unnk r of workstation <br /> access-points, size of collections, number of patrons and data,records factorrntc�what each ember <br /> m <br /> pays. A small library with four workstations and a 15,000 volume collection is not using the same <br /> mount of resources as a library with 15 workstations and a 00,000 volume collection, Mr. Connor's <br /> comment about some smaller libraries'fees going down while Sandwich's went up is trice but because <br /> of the volume of usage_ I would compare the situation to a SUV owner wanting to pay the same cost <br /> for fuel as a driver who opts for a gas electric hybrid car. Mashpee's costs this year are just-under <br /> 21,000 for 10 workstations, 7,000 cardholders, 35,000 volumes and 113, 200 transactions. For <br /> companson, Sandwich was-billed,$33,000 for 15 workstations, 13,000 cardholders, 62,000 volumes <br /> and 202,500 transactions. <br /> think Sandwich patrons will be greatly inconvenienced by this dedision. I dont think their lost interests <br /> were really considered. They will to register and travel to a CLAIMS library.-to continue to use cape <br />