Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Public Library <br /> P.O. Box 657 <br /> Mashpee, Alla 02649 <br /> Circulation figures for the first half of FY 2005 totaled 62,934 iters. This is e <br /> substantial increase over the same time period last year. At that time: 58,023 <br /> iters circulated, giving us a gain of 4.911 items. Some of that is certainly due to <br /> being able to restore Friday hours. In the recent circulation statistics from <br /> CLAMS, only sic libraries on the Cape and Islands were busier than Mashpee. <br /> All of them are much bigger buildings than Mashpee. Falmouth, Bourne, Orleans <br /> and Harwich were substantially busier. Brewster and Nantucket were less than <br /> 2,000-items ahead of Mashpee while Brewster is about 3,400 items more. The <br /> library was closed Fridays for the first 13 weeks of the fiscal while we brought the <br /> staffing back to full levels. If we had been open, an average Friday circulation of <br /> 261 iters would have brought us up to Brewstees level., That figure would be a <br /> slow day for a Friday. At the current pace, vire should circulate about 1151 g <br /> items, which would be an all time high for the library. <br /> I have been putting many hours into the building grant. At this point, l would <br /> estimate Sheldon and I have completed about % of the application. Some of <br /> the remaining sections are heavily dependent on information the architect will <br /> supply. At this point: Stewart Roberts is refining the interior and exterior design <br /> of the building. During ray vacation, 1 asked Bridget and Janet B to review the <br /> plans of the Reference, Young Adult, Children's and workroom areas of the plan. <br /> They attended the building committee meeting in my absence to provide <br /> . <br /> feedback to the architect and the committee on how well those areas of the <br /> library could function as designed. Mr. Roberts took that information and revised <br /> r the layout. The revision was presented at the meeting on January 4 th. The <br /> revision was a big improvement over the first design but still needs a few <br /> modifications. Bridget and Janet were extremely helpful' in reviewing the plans <br /> and suggesting changes. We have a meeting on January 11 'r which should <br /> g g g <br /> reflect the comments received on the . <br />