Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> the help of,the present school administration. <br /> 5 <br /> is opinion that this committee is not properly informed or notified of Board of 1 It <br /> decisions and communications regar&ug Cable Television issue, <br /> g: At the date of the draft: I have not been given the name, address, phone number . <br /> or any other contact information regar&ng a new member (female) whom you have <br /> approved to Join this con itw . Another newly approved memher,Joe De o, has <br /> e assed me greatly b anno that he had applied to become a meter and <br /> then contacted me with some of the information above, He did, at least, contact me a <br /> week before he was approved by the Board but NO subnusion of his letter of intent or <br /> that of the woman was ever passed to me or the committee. <br /> 1 issued a memo (attached) by e-mail dated 3-17-99 express ing nay ire that I had not <br /> been notified by the issuing authority nor Media One regarding the following; <br /> A stitutional Network Group"Contact Person Responsibilities" <br /> 6X I-NET Esti â–ºate Requirements <br /> that the.Selectmen's Selectmen's office had <br /> It appears responded but that the documents had not <br /> been received by Maxy o' eee. As a rest, she stated to me that this could delay the <br /> response to the RFP requested by April 1, 1999,from Media One. <br /> I was unhappy because I had never seen a copy of the rust for response by April <br /> first. Also I-had never seen a copy of the two documents in question nor the ' own7s <br /> response to then. Sad I been aware of the above conucations, I could easily have <br /> taken care of the problem in a timely manner. <br /> , The MCAC has been concerned about other issues. The Selectmen's office entered i <br />