My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/30/1998 MASHPEE COMMONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes
>
7/30/1998 MASHPEE COMMONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2018 12:44:05 PM
Creation date
5/9/2018 12:43:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
MASHPEE COMMONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/30/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Y Chairman, <br /> Mashpee Commons Committee <br /> Town of Mashpee <br /> 16 Great Neck Rd.,No. <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 August 3, 1998 <br /> Re: Tischler and Associates, Inc.-General Approach/ Operating expenditures/ <br /> Capital Expenditures <br /> Dear Selectman Marsters and Committee Members, <br /> I have reviewed the referenced analysis and have the following comments. <br /> The General Approach taken whereby only specific identifiable costs during the <br /> construction phase are utilized does not, in my opinion, provide a for a meaningful <br /> Financial Impact Analysis. Although it is meaningful to evaluate the costs VS income <br /> during construction, the more important measure is continuing impacts after completion. <br /> For example, when construction is complete the income from permits becomes negligible <br /> and actual cost increases. <br /> Why isn't the Boch Center included ? <br /> The new residents and businesses will have full benefit from the various <br /> investments Mashpee has made in land and infrastructure, yet no recognition of their <br /> obligation to share in the still outstanding principal and interest payments. <br /> The intent of the study is to determine the fiscal impact to the town. I think it is <br /> mandatory that new Water District Infrastructure costs be included. <br /> Additionally, the comparison of current to proposed zoning should include what <br /> the impacts of going to a separate tax rate (150 % of Residential) for non-residential <br /> property would be. This is the practice in a large number of Massachusetts Communities. <br /> The application of Level of Service (LOS) and Zero Percent (0 %) inflation is <br /> done in a manner that tends to understate cost projections and provide a more favorable <br /> than actual picture. Specific comments that provide a few examples of many <br /> understatements are : <br /> The utilization of"new employee" salary numbers does not account for <br /> training and step increases that are not a function of inflation. The step <br /> increases will put any employee at the top grade after much less than 20 <br /> years. <br /> A Police Car is not a one time capital expense. They have a useful life. <br /> While it may be possible to construct a rationale that if the only growth <br /> was this project, some services would not require added supervision and <br /> administration. At close to 200 dwellings added per year, supervision and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.