Laserfiche WebLink
could yield a range of only 41 to 23 units, because it assumes only a few, or no one bedroom <br /> units and reflects a larger average number of bedrooms per unit, To balance need with number <br /> of units, a developer could plan similarly between the two concepts. <br /> Mr. Abbott inquired about consultation with the Fire Department and Mr. Kuchar confirmed that <br /> they had consulted with them resulting in no preliminary issues. Going forward, a separate fire <br /> lane may be needed to access the rear of the buildings. The Chair questioned whether sprinkler <br /> systems are mandated in the state building code for the townhouses, and Mr. Kuchar responded <br /> that he was unsure about Mashpee requirements. The Chair expressed concern a developer may <br /> feel that a townhouse development would be financially infeasible if sprinklers were required, in <br /> spite of the possibility that this approach might be more attractive to Mashpee. Mr. Kuchar <br /> responded that the developer would be responsible for addressing the issue. <br /> Mr. Kuchar concluded by pointing out that the RFP should include design elements such as, <br /> advanced wastewater treatment system, low impact development, green infrastructure, <br /> stormwater management, recycling, reclaiming, reusing, native plantings and renewable energy <br /> considerations. Incorporation of these items would be good for site design, protect natural <br /> resources and would not be cost prohibitive. <br /> There was a question from the audience regarding the third lot and Mr. Kuchar explained that the <br /> lot was being used as a credit for the offset for wastewater flow. It was unlikely to be used as a <br /> leaching field as it would be cost prohibitive. The land would remain unbuilt, but trails could be <br /> added to the land. It was also noted that the paper road would be blocked off and existed now as <br /> a path. <br /> Christopher Kirrane, attorney for South Cape Resort, stated that his client had expressed <br /> significant concern about an increase in activity and traffic at the site and the sharing of a single <br /> access. South Cape Resort were concerned about how the development would impact their <br /> operation and hoped that their concerns would be considered as the proposal advanced. <br /> Chairman Isbitz stated that concerns could be addressed during the permit and hearing process <br /> with a developer, but was beyond the scope of the study. Mr. Abbott inquired whether South <br /> Cape Resort had any suggestions. Mr. Kirrane responded that he hoped that it would be a <br /> cooperative effort between South Cape Resort, the Town and the developer. In addition, it was <br /> his opinion that the amount of traffic related to the number of units being built, adding that <br /> increased traffic could be an issue of safety. The Chair stated that they would welcome the <br /> participation of the owners of South Cape Village, noting that the Town was seeking also to <br /> address an unmet need for affordable housing in Mashpee. It was confirmed that a traffic study <br /> would be addressed by a developer. Richard Halpern inquired whether the road was private or <br /> town owned and Mr. Taylor stated that he would check on the status of the newly named Cooper <br /> Road. Mr. Kuchar confirmed that the Town had access rights. <br /> Mr. Abbott expressed his appreciation to residents attending the meeting. Ms. Stone thanked Mr. <br /> Kuchar for his work. Mr. Kuchar will make changes to the townhouse table and suggested <br /> adding recommendations that the large seven acre parcel be set aside for passive recreation use. <br /> It was noted that it could be jointly used with South Cape Resort. There was consensus to add it <br /> to the report. Chairman Isbitz requested that abutters receive a copy of the Phase I Feasibility <br /> 3 <br />