Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> Page 4 . Minutes 1991 <br /> 4 <br /> diffusers cut the loading in half and reduce pathogen and ni- <br /> trate loading. Mr. McQuaid suggested that the Board review <br /> the B HED's proposed regulation and comment on it next week. <br /> A discussion ensued regarding the installation, cost and area <br /> requirement differences between pits and diffusers. <br /> 15, Draft regional Recycling Report, Mr, McQuaid informed <br /> the Board that the meeting has once again been postponed be- <br /> cause this report just came out and time is needed to review <br /> and comment on it. Mr. Greelish stated that he will take the <br /> time to fully digest the report. The new meeting date is <br /> March 6. 1991 t P.M. at our office. M . Greelish indicated <br /> disappointment with the advisory committee which did notad- <br /> vise the authors of the report. <br /> 16. waste A weigh--end release. Mr, costa made all the ar- <br /> rangements to meet Mr. Lopez at the bank and saw to it that <br /> the final bill was paid in full. Bard members signed the <br /> bond release. <br /> 17, Copy of letter from Mater District-to-Ex,---Sec. Re: cost <br /> f water- at gatehouse, Acknowledged. <br /> 18. Illegal dumping complaint followThis dumping <br /> occured on Ashumet Road beyond oak Hollow condos. At the <br /> Agent's request the DPW had cleaned up the entire area in- <br /> volving many loads being brought to the landfill which may <br /> have caused the recent problem between the DPW and DiMaggio, <br /> Since then the dumping has started again. Mr. Costa suggested <br /> sending a letter to the Ex, sec, explaining what has happened <br /> and suggesting the possibility of -erecting gates. . <br /> I9, . Invitations chamber of Commerce Dinner & Police station <br /> Dedication, Acknowledged. <br /> . , r <br /> R <br /> 20. Boar�d to vote - o authorize baymefit to W&S out of <br /> Hydro-Geo Phase II for equi meat artia , a ent. r. Doherty <br /> motioned to approve, Mr. Greelish seconded, all in agreement. <br /> 21 . Perc extension re ust N.S. Promontory Point Phase III. <br /> Ir. Costa questioned whether the agents could inspect the <br /> soils at the time f installation rather than extend the <br /> peres for a► second time or require new peres. Mr. McQuaid <br /> stated that it is not the Board's policy to extend peres for <br /> a second time unless there are extenuating circumstances or a <br /> hardship can be proven, lir, Greelish stated that extensions <br /> are handled on a case by case basis and this request does not <br /> warrant approval . So moved. <br /> 22 , Complaint, Lakeside Trailer Park, Mr. Costa questioned <br />