Laserfiche WebLink
ze J <br /> 4 <br /> NUNUTES June 1 3, 1996 3 BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> concerned citizen questioned, "'Is JAugat taking responsibility for this spilling for <br /> the homeowner"s.who are being affected right noir?" <br /> Attorney Davidson responded, "Augat always had responsibility for the sell or <br /> discharge in 1993."# "The question is, is there any connection between that discharge and <br /> this.", "That's what this investigation is about." <br /> Mr. Ball questioned, 'O <br /> nce all the information is gathered homer long will it take to <br /> find out who is responsible`" <br /> Mr. Kearns responded, `eight now our focus is on emanating the risk." `Where <br /> ugat has stepped up to the plate and taken the actions necessary, that's going to continue <br /> to be our focus." <br /> A concerned citizen questioned, `FIs there more T.C.E. being seeped out from any <br /> of Augat's holding tanks?' <br /> I ir. Frigon responded, "We never had holding tanks." <br /> Mr. Cram questioned, "Was T.C.E. frond in the area of the leaching facility in <br /> 1991T13 <br /> Mr. Fri on responded, "No, not according to any of our records." <br /> concerned citizen questioned, "What was in there?" <br /> i <br /> MT. Fr gon responded, for-oil, we removed the soil until we got clean soil." " . . . <br /> requires that we notify them."' "They required us to monitor our drinking water ell.' <br /> "The test to analyze drinking water includes .o.c.'s." "We used that well up until one <br /> year ago then we gent on public water. <br /> 51 <br /> A concerned citizen questioned, "Have you tested the well since you tied into <br /> public rater` " <br /> Mr. Fri on "N . <br /> greplied, <br /> Discussion took place as to whether other industrial sites in the area could have <br /> contributed to the groundwater contaMiDation. <br />