Laserfiche WebLink
MfNUTES August l, 1996 4 BOARD of HEALTH <br /> "It's been the Board's policy to consider the edge of the wetlands as our primary concern <br /> not a coastal bank which is non-eroding." <br /> Mr. Ball. questioned, "So basically, that would cone under the Conservation <br /> Commission not our Board`'," <br /> Mr. McQuaid responded, `That's correct." "'our regulation deals with eroding <br /> coastal banks which is not the case in this situation.' <br /> Mr. Ball questioned, "If that's the case then why would we even have to grant a <br /> variance?71) <br /> 71) <br /> fir. McQuaid responded, "Because the new Title v requires a separation of ' <br /> from the top of the coastal hark."� "They don't define it as eroding or non-eroding our <br /> regulation does.�1 <br /> Mr. Ball questioned Mr. Sar cki, "Do you know if the applicant is going to be <br /> year-round or seasonal`" <br /> Mr. Sanicki responded, "The applicant lues in Vermont." "I don't know if he <br /> intends to sell the property or nota, "I couldn't tell you." <br /> Mr. Lupo stated, "Getting hack to that site plan.�10 "I was asked to produce that <br /> site plan to dispute the accuracy of the Cape & Islands ngineer* go" "I feel that I have <br /> clone it." "I have done it to a point that elevations are wrong on that plan, well locations <br /> are wrong and I don't know what else you need to say that the plan is made luate.711 11t <br /> should not only be turned down aside from the fact that the playa as presented does not <br /> meet Title W" "The bio-elere system and the u.v. light system there are no specifications <br /> provided to the Board for it which is required by Title V.131P "I don't understand why you <br /> people still want to keep approving this plan when you don't have enough information. <br /> Mr. Doherty stated, "As far as the Bio-clere unit is concerned we've had numerous <br /> presentations by bio-clere and we have most of that information on file, that's not ars <br /> issue.'' "As far as this plan goes the plan fails to show any significant errors." "In fact, it <br /> confirms that your well is outside of a 100' of the proposed leaching area so, I really <br /> wouldn't say that's working in favor of your ase." <br /> Mr. Lupo stated, "Is there a 23" error between their location and my location and <br /> if there is then why isn't that an error." <br /> i <br />