Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JULY 11, 2018 <br /> Attorney Brian Wall with an office in Sandwich, MA represented the petitioner William <br /> Haney who was also present. The application is an appeal of a cease and desist order issued <br /> by the Building Commissioner which orders Mr. Haney to cease and desist use of his <br /> property for landing a private helicopter. <br /> Mr. Wali said he has represented Mr. Haney for other projects in Town. He obtained a <br /> helicopter license and currently flies for recreational purposes. <br /> The property issue at 540 Great Neck Road South is a 9 acre parcel of land that has a single- <br /> family dwelling. Mr. Haney purchased the property in 1984. In 2007 sought to construct <br /> the helipad and determination of FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) for suitability of <br /> the site, and obtained the determination that he could have this land area. He also obtained <br /> approval from.the Massachusetts Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division. <br /> Mr. Wall said that Mr. Haney constructed a gravel landing area with a windsock and a <br /> storage shed for the helicopter and began using the helipad. Mr. Haney uses the helipad <br /> during the summer, and flies in and out about 2-3 times a week. <br /> In 2010, a neighbor complained, and that the Building Commissioner at that time issued a <br /> cease and desist order. Mr. Haney responded to that order by bringing to that Building <br /> Commissioner's attention the law of Massachusetts as it was then existing, that a Town <br /> was not allowed to enforce its zoning bylaw against private landing areas that were <br /> approved by the FAA and the Massachusetts DOT unless their bylaw had been reviewed <br /> by the Department of Transportation and approved. <br /> The case law states that Massachusetts has essentially made a policy determination that it <br /> wants to foster use of the airways for private aircraft. A determination very similar to <br /> exemptions for education, religious uses or sober houses, which is basically immune from <br /> zoning. <br /> That Building Commissioner confirmed this by talking to the Counsel for the Department <br /> of Transportation and agreed that was the law and the 2010 cease and desist order was <br /> withdrawn. <br /> Mr. Haney has continued to use the helipad since then until March of this year the Building <br /> Commissioner issued another cease and desist order because of a complaint by a neighbor, <br /> and in the cease and desist order the Building Commissioner sited a change in the law that <br /> came about by a decision by the Supreme Judicial Court. <br /> Mr. Wall said that the first argument is regarding pre-existing, non-conforming use. He <br /> said the helipad was constructed in 2007, and has been used continuously since 2007, and <br /> mentioned that the lave at the time the helipad was created,municipalities could not enforce <br /> the zoning bylaw in a manner that would prohibit a private land owner from creating and <br /> using a private restricted land area unless the bylaw had been approved by the Aeronautics <br /> Division. <br /> 4 <br />