Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD F SELECTMEN Page ll <br /> MINUTES <br /> MONDAY9 SEPTEMBER 99 1991 <br /> Recreation Center: <br /> We had to rec ind that. Did you recieves this lir. Reardon after <br /> if was voted on in Executive Meeting asks Y Selectma a.ff*, n Yes <br /> repl.ys Counsel. And then you presented this other letter? Yes replys <br /> Counsel, <br /> The other letter was sent to the attention of Jerry Carter axed' <br /> with a carbon cop went to Wil Hanson. I don' t think there was any- <br /> thing sinister at all states Counsel, <br /> I' d like to say something about that states Mr. Lawrence, It is <br /> not unlikely and many times the Board of Selectmen will vote on <br /> proposed contract to find out how the members of the Board Feel. And <br /> if they Feel strongly enough, it is sent to Town Counsel. It' s not <br /> final. vote. The only time you finl.l.y vote on anything is when You <br /> i <br /> take the vote to sign the agreement. It was never even contemplated. <br /> However, we did not recieve a. copy of that letter states Selectman <br /> Jacobson that came back from Mr. Reardon, When we were discussing the <br /> property, we had to request it. <br /> There are several points that I think need to be clarified so the <br /> Town can understand states Counsel. I am very reluctant to discuss this <br /> because the Attorney - Client privilege is present here and I view the <br /> Board of Selectmen as my client. Since the Board voted to reveal this <br /> letter, still fe. -1 uncomfortable about that. It is always uncomfortable <br /> for an attorney to talk about a. client in a. relationship that is xist- <br /> ing. <br /> I don' t thin the agreement was ever specifically referred to me <br /> states Counsel, It was contained in part of the package that I get when <br /> I attend Selectmen'en' s meetings. And I saw it there and I wrote this <br /> letter because I observed it there and because I was worried about some <br /> of the things I saw. The original letter. that I sent says confidential <br /> on the top in bold, black print. This represents a communication between <br /> an attorney and a client and it intended only for the eyes of the addressee <br /> To be designated to those persons herein to be designated to recieve a <br /> copy hereof <br /> The letter was addressed to Terry, dated MaY 3, 1991. I sent it <br /> to Terry' s office via fax at 4: 12 p.m. and immediately faxed a copy to <br /> Kevin and mailed a. hard copy to Kevin, Jerry and Wil who are the a.dressee, s <br /> on that, There was a reason for doing that. The reason is obvious state s <br /> Counsel. There are comments here that really should be privileged to the <br /> negotiating team. They are not the kind of comments that the other side <br /> should see. Until such time as the negotiating team wants then to see. <br /> That is the official position that Counsel was taking, <br /> So these comments were directed to the eyes of the people who <br /> were involved. Known to me to be directly involved with the negotiations <br /> which were Jerry, Wil and our Executive Secretary. The rest of the <br /> Board did. not get a copy of this because I didn' t thin it was appropriate <br /> at that time to publica.11y dispose this to the entire Board. <br /> To my knowledge and belief the two Selectmen I had mentioned cnn- <br /> tinued to have the support of the Board of Selectmen. As far as con- <br /> stituting the negotiating team reports Counsel. Again, I don' t see <br /> anything unusual or rare about my addressing what I consider to. be a <br /> very sensitive negotiating ratter to the entire Board. Whether confining <br /> it to �`he negotiating team* The Executive Secretary frequently gets <br /> letters from ane that are for his eyes only, <br />