Laserfiche WebLink
•I <br /> yl �, <br /> ti • <br /> y i <br /> ' 0FL. A OF I AR ' wA)(AND SAS.SIMTr LAN <br /> POST OFMCK aoc ale <br /> Y NNtS, MASSACHUWrTS 0260 JOSEPH J.AJZ <br /> : •• -, h1f� <br /> S 5 <br /> F # Wn1.LIAPbl V1I t ) 771.46-34 <br /> 1- <br /> FAA <br /> •,Y, . .Ai 700.1334 <br /> May 2 , 2 <br /> '"y <br /> f <br /> .w <br /> P,irricis White <br /> '�- O f l*:+� of Building Inspector <br /> '} r Tod:#j of Mabspee <br /> 1 : at Neck Road Forth <br /> Y-ashpee, MA 02649 <br /> .* R 8, S. uildin Inspector <br /> 13: William Zammer <br /> 4` = PSC' <br /> , <br /> I a:ki writIng to confirm our telephone conver t Ion of 4th[isafccrnoon. A <br /> you on the phone, I have absolutelyt o knowl6dge whatsoever relative <br /> \ S <br /> `. <br /> ..'to rd ii matter except what I noted on the front page of the Palmouth Enterprise <br /> r <br /> 'May x.21 1992 edition which I rec6ived in the Mail on Ttiesday, May 26, 1992. <br /> - <br /> # <br /> Alfso, ifs1 n Tuesday, I received a cryptic nate from our receptionist, Kinn Crocker, <br /> whit.-h stated the following Pat called. Proc cd to gel injun l ion in court <br /> ,on lcl nl ," in discussing this note with Kim it became readily apparent <br /> { ` oOar both you rid Kim believed that I vas privy to knowledge relative <br /> a <br /> to Oils dispute and therefore would readily un erstand"the message. <br /> � z Neither I nor Leslie had discussed this matter pith Door had any knowledge <br /> 5rt <br /> of Che. di pure. A search of our records indicated a receipt of the letter <br /> ii <br /> f+ r6 rOoug to Zammer dated Mai 20 which w received May 22. I was in <br /> Uasbpee from 9:45 A.M. on this date attending to the deposition of Tom <br /> Fad;Aa in the pending suit of F,I \ iC. yrs# Mashpee, I left the Town Fall at <br /> :50 ri.ni, and returned to my office for a very brief time. I toted the rr er <br /> 1 tt� •r from Doug for the f first tI a today after nay disco sior with da y <br /> } f} a��1 copy <br /> 1/�] arrived, <br /> j`j•V� [ham [yy <br /> ++•+ f'. {• r � Jt# + � <br /> When the FAX cop the letter arri d, lie I i7 c that <br /> *.. s dad seen the hard copy version and she found it and gave It to me. <br /> d 1, ftsvm this clarifies the apparent vast confusion that exists. el <br /> fieed a copy of the Board of Appeals records rerding the application, <br /> f' hear[Gig and grant of the special permit. Included within these records, I <br /> 4P r <br /> I'.1 require Minutes of the Board of Appeals so that I can see If r+ presentati , <br /> # 4 <br /> 1 <br /> '-' .# re made, I would also ask you o please idez�tlfy for me rhe zoning <br /> + +: <br /> is •r .t I which this property is located. I b06 1t the "C-1" gone but <br /> ;: . 'vv pp eciate o nfirm ation. <br /> A Isc., 'Would you kindly direct the Police Department to proceed immediately <br /> she scene to take a photographic record of;the violakion that exists In <br /> or -:r chat i may have this demonstracIve evidence available to show to the <br /> 1 <br /> * d##*P <br /> I�f <br /> Yj <br /> r' <br />