|
How w 1 1 1 the F i nance Comm i ttee re s)po n d to t l„ia � af r rev i ew-i rig
<br /> vu,ry carefully the r uio n cost w�� vi l I 'l n o w try to bury $'I
<br /> i-ii 17 I -i o ”?
<br /> D 1 r G r e "l -is h 't- e :�1s.i r,a f� o r�I s p ekf(.)r h e������I f n
<br /> ' '11 recommend bud q 19 't h e a.s s ess e,d v a] u(-,�s She would rather
<br /> . h e It;o w n k n ca w u p -f r o r7 t t 1"i P, c os t of 'the 'land ,
<br /> Mr ,, Griffin stated , 'if the, towr-1 budgets the sed values , then
<br /> the attorney �,:.ind jury w-i -1 'l . reo: .}she assessed va-1 u s the true
<br /> values of 'the 'land . We need to find ca way 'to state -it so 'it-,
<br /> Can the C tnmlttee increase the coritingency for the const rr.,u(-,t 10 11
<br /> budget"?
<br /> Mr ., Benway stated -the ppra-ised carses>se 1 value, cannot
<br /> discussed o r.) t o w rr) rn e t l r� floor, �i �t:. w�i �l .l r r j u d i c e , t h
<br /> n g t'i at'i ons .
<br /> When questions are asked , the Comralttee can gay Under -'Ghe advise
<br /> of town ccaun 'l , we cannot pub l -i li those figures .
<br /> Mr . r rances h Yi stated the. s s ss- va'lue d l f f c:r n[:e will reopen
<br /> the Issue s u of s—i te is � ]"here, is a rii r e s i n i .F iant, difference in
<br /> values tiro pp r a i s d v ] ues ,, Di ' s i- port- says there,
<br /> is not a significant difference between the two sites .,
<br /> T o i) Counsel told Mr- � (-r-..i ff j n -the C:o�=Jttee has to SFr)a k , t h i r
<br /> flee.is--i ons based on tFie expo r=tt the
<br /> Mr . Denn'i u I,,e getting a good em-i nent dotyl i n lawyer er and do
<br /> the, best you can . '75% of the assessed valUes would not relate, 't o
<br /> the app ral'sa l s n You no-ed to budget enough -for, a. coiffo rt, level ,.
<br /> He suggested budgeting $1 mill -ion n d say-ing that f.� u r i s based
<br /> an cf rripet nt appraisals but 'down GO(A` se] has adv'i sed not
<br /> revealing the appralsal figures .
<br /> T o f`l'y asked h ca will be, doing the net t it li n "? If 11-, is an ern i to n t
<br /> c rna i n attorney we need 'to guts rates , ars idea ca-1" -the cost.
<br /> Mr . Griffin roade a motion to budget and publ '-sh $1
<br /> million `for .the use of land taking and add $200 , 000 for
<br /> the. 'l egg.l , appraisal and other expenses to the
<br /> construction costs and agreed not to 4 (Ass how we
<br /> arrived a-A that f` (Amber o Ms . AhIgren :ccaf d,,!zA th motion .
<br /> Discussion :
<br /> i..d
<br /> l ` VL Jones �i concerned he' The con qtr--u��tl n cost,s
<br /> are l--)ar ed with th
<br /> State a�� a�f F d ] and �.r i s moi.r e f i t,, Committee agreed t�l f�h i..r e ci rN I o t
<br /> matter h n t b'l i s h l ri g a. u d g e t
<br /> Tom asked if we need -to surveyeach parcel "?
<br /> Mr ., r I f f-i r s .-i d it was p rev I us l y discussed 'i f we t ake-% an entire
<br /> p rc� l we do not ne:1ed ars `i nd i v`i �dLIE survey ,. He will a
<br /> r�
<br />
|