Laserfiche WebLink
-URAL RFP <br /> ARCH IT EC'1 <br /> Paul Griff in prepared a draft architectural and design services <br /> RFP for the Committees review. He reviewed 4 RFP' ,s of recent <br /> school projects and then met with Joe Polito to draft the <br /> criteria. <br /> Project Site -the arch`i tect w-1 I I have to know of the two S1 tes <br /> and get 2 site plans ,, The final site will not yet be chosen ,, <br /> Estimatedprp I <br /> ject costs : you have to give the engineering company <br /> the scope of what the work will be . He reviewed Wareham High <br /> Schools RFP. Ile also reviewed DRA ' s information on how to <br /> calculate the numbers , Mr . Griffin calculated we will need <br /> approximate'ly 200 , 000 sq feet which equal $27 million and he <br /> allowed for another potent i'al $3 million for community uses . <br /> Thi ts does not inclUde land . The architect is only concerned wi' th <br /> construction . <br /> Mr ,. Marti ros asked -if we are getting plans for the addition? <br /> N . The building design w tll incorporate the need for a. future <br /> addition and plan for it but w1l ] not, design it. <br /> Fee .- I n own Counsel and Executive Secretary must rev i'ew this <br /> sect!on . The design fee has to be included in the total amount <br /> allocated at town meeting , They must submit two proposals , c)ne <br /> -for services , one, for -fee . <br /> Services Required : Mr . Griffin explained he did not want to <br /> narrow it down to much . Footnote #1 was in al I other RFPs and <br /> should be checked out . <br /> Mr . Jones thinks something should be said about meeting the <br /> challenge of -future energy needs re : operating costs . <br /> Mr . Griffin did not want to narrow the scope of this issue down <br /> to much ; it may eliminate issues the Committee ha:s not even <br /> thought of . Mr Gree lish noted they will have to meet the energy <br /> requ-irement under code now . The Committee can give criteria and <br /> present concerns at the appropriate time and it is not outside. of <br /> the scope of work . Mr . D i n i z i o noted the Committee was impressed <br /> with DRA beGaUse they did not come with preconceived notions , <br /> they showed alternatives . If you speoffy needs in advance , the <br /> firm may tailor their presentation to meet that. <br /> The wording is changed to read "At least one alternative shall be, <br /> developed sufficiently to develop a cost estimate for <br /> construction and building operating cost <br /> Design Changes .-, 'the, CommIttee does not want 'to be nickled and <br /> dimed by c1hange orders . They don ' t want to pay for 1 tem s the <br /> architect should have thought about or discussed with the <br /> Committee,, The Committee agreed that design work for change <br /> orders over $500 , 000 will be at a fee of 3%. This is incentive to <br /> do a good job. The Committee would like to include no additional <br /> fee for any change order under $100 , 000 with an aggregate of <br /> $500� 000 . They will get feedback on thi's'. <br /> Qua if i cat ions : the Liability Insurance question is one -for town <br /> counsel . Mr . Griffin only added extras, not those required by <br /> law. Sufficient levels of staff to complete . . . the Committee <br /> 3 <br />