My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/12/1993 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
10/12/1993 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:18:21 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 11:53:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
at th <br /> Mr . Polito expla-ined the architect will be so busy trying to <br /> design a school and develop the best possible arrangement, <br /> meas r-jalts will be secondary . He cannot be, bogged down by the <br /> Committee ' s fanat-Icism of a certain itori). This Committee does <br /> not have time to do inve8t4gaticin . <br /> Mr . Jones mentioned the Committee will have a lot of <br /> investigative work to do when choosing an Architectural 'Firm. <br /> Help from someone like this would be a god send ,. <br /> Ms . AhIgren stated she would like a person that answers to the <br /> Committee, 14Ise the educational consultant. The Committee can <br /> ask the architects (when interviewing them) how they would work <br /> wltl,,) a Project Manager who -is working for the Committee. <br /> 'Fhe Committee discu8sed how much a project manager may cost. <br /> Mr. Jones thionks they are only needed for the design phase ; will <br /> need this service for the next year at the most. It W! I I Cost at <br /> tops $100 1 000 a <br /> Mr. Diniz,lo stated Mr . Griffin recommend hiring by phases , with <br /> Phase I for the design phase and an option in tVie. contract to <br /> retain 'the person as a clerk of the works during the, construction <br /> phase . <br /> M <br /> r. <br /> iniz 'o w 'I 11 ask that firm to crn <br /> oe to the next meeting to D <br /> discuss the-jr services . He w i l ] talk to Bob Writenhour -about <br /> procedure (fl-,a.n the Comm] ttee -inv-ite therti) . <br /> Greg Tay'lorstated the Committee will be spending $4 .4-$2 million <br /> on an Architect, they need to hire someone they are very <br /> comfortable with . He thinks they will have a cost consultant <br /> working with them and you have to have the Architect do that cost <br /> comparison , The architect will not be selected on the price and <br /> will not be ba8hful with the, fee. . You bet-ter be happy with the <br /> person you are spending $2 million on . <br /> Mr. Pollto stated that it riot the point the architect will do <br /> his 'Job but this Committee has to review all of that and we need <br /> s <br /> someone, to help do that. <br /> The Committee agreed 'they want to invite someone -in and get more <br /> Information on these, types of services and they agreed they need <br /> some level of service to be determined and def-Ined . <br /> **Mr . Jones made a riot lori that the Committee 'take the <br /> following steps .. invite a representative -from the <br /> construction management firm ( info rete lved last week <br /> from P . Griffin ) to give the Committee an outline of the <br /> scope of their services and assist us in the choice of <br /> whether this is or -is not an appropriate level of <br /> service . Ms . AhIgren seconded the mo ion . <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.