My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/17/1993 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
8/17/1993 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:14:15 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 12:46:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/17/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> on the aerial photos . <br /> D. Southern end._..._of Rte 130 s i to ---access i s f rom No f sy Ho I e Road . <br /> Gary Larson stated this i to gets pinched for space . It is not <br /> really adequate space for all that goes with a high school . None <br /> of the fields have parking areas so people w.i l l probably ark o <br /> Meetinghouse Rd which is a problem <br /> The Committee decided to keep a 400 foot buff r from the <br /> commercial property . <br /> The Committee discussed the possibilities of moving the <br /> building/fields , <br /> Mr. Di ni zui o is concerned about the posy i bi l i ty of contamination <br /> on the site . A proposed site with no remediation necessary must <br /> be cheaper than a site with remediation ra ce ry for hazardous <br /> waste. we reed an option/alternative -to keep us away from those <br /> issues . <br /> Mr. Franceschi stated cleanup may be considered an extraordinary <br /> cost, <br /> Other Issues <br /> DRA will consider the middle portion , field ares. of 2nd Rte 130 <br /> site for possible building site . <br /> - Does the Committee have an opinion on the future elementary <br /> school ? The Committee agreed it has to be shown . A site large <br /> eno <br /> ugh -for future school i the reason these 2 <br /> sites were chosen , <br /> APPRAISALS <br /> Tom was asked by Bob Whritenour to write the RFP, He will get i <br /> to Town Counsel for their review this week, The Committee <br /> reviewed the letter Chairman R i n i i o wrote outlining the work the <br /> Committee needs , Tori will word in so the Town can take a piece <br /> of a parcel if necessary . He is writing the proposal for` a Phase <br /> I and Phase II work noting Phase II is subjecto -town meeting <br /> approval . The dates the work should be completed by should be <br /> included i r the performance section . <br /> It can be advertised now, noting a future date the RFP will be <br /> available. The Executive Secretary was not comfortable doing it <br /> that way. Tom does not know how long it will take town counsel <br /> to review it. <br /> Chairman Di ni z i o will ask Selectmen Vacarro to ask Tow' Counsel <br /> to expedite this work , <br /> Who will select the appraiser? The Executive Secretary can hire <br /> therm as the procurement officer but he will probably delegate the <br /> Finterviews to this Comm i tt and ask they make a recommendation . <br /> Town Counsel should be consulted on what will happen <br /> if O' Leary <br /> is not chosen and he has already done some work? <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.