My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/29/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
3/29/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:06:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 1:38:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/29/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE <br /> TUESDAY, MARCH 29 , 1994 <br /> TOWN HALL <br /> Present: Merry Sue A h l g ren , Bill Ma rt i ros, Bill Jones, Stege G ree l i s h , <br /> Peter D i n i z i o , Michael Pare, Paul Griffin , Janice Mills , Joe Polito <br /> Tots Fuda l a, Greg Taylor , Gus Fredricks <br /> Meeting convened at 7 * 06 p .m. <br /> INUTES <br /> Merry Sue made a motion to accept the minutes of March 15 and <br /> March 22nd . Bill Jones seconded the motion . All members were in <br /> favor. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Jane Coogan explained she has been in Europe for l month and recently <br /> learned of the Committee' s plans to hire a p ro4 ect manager which raised <br /> some questions and concerns. She was at the Selectmen ' s meeting when it was <br /> resented to them but Peter Di n i z i o had left the meeting when it was time <br /> for public comments . she asked why the town went out with an RFP with a <br /> Nov. 16 to Dec . S window when the town did not vote to appropriate funds <br /> until after that? Has the Committee defined the responsibilities of a <br /> project manager, a "project representative" , clerk of the works, project <br /> manager , and architect? Do have salaries for all of this? She has <br /> concerns about Chartwell , how much their fees are? In Lexington they were <br /> 10% of the tota.l proj ect. This raises a lot of questions for her, She <br /> thought about it because she knows someone who is an AIA registered <br /> architect, charges low fees and is internationally known . She called <br /> Lexington and found out the roof leaks and the elevator doesn ' t work . This <br /> all raises questions so she came her tonight. <br /> She asked if the Committee has , in writing , charting of the <br /> respons i b i l i t i es and salaries of the positions? <br /> Peter explained an RFP was issued , it is public record , on record in the <br /> Selectmen ' s office . It was submitted through the office of the E ecuti ire <br /> See retar last fal almost simultaneous with the RFP for the Architect. <br /> All of it was done through Town Counsel . If you want a detailed knowledge <br /> of the scopeofresponsibilities of the project manager, it is all laid out <br /> d. <br /> in the RFP, Town council advised leaving the fee open so we can negotiate <br /> with the firm. <br /> Ms . Coogan asked if the activities were defined for the Architect and f o r <br /> the clerk of the works - the whole picture ? <br /> Peter explained there are two RFP ' s - one for the project manager and one <br /> for the architect. Both are public record. Her comment about an AIA <br /> registered arch i tett - Chartwell did submit the name of an architectural <br /> firm they will work with to provide those services . <br /> Coogan <br /> said she does not understand why, when hiring a project manager <br /> to do cost estimating , the architectural oversight has to go out with that, <br /> as subcontractors . <br /> Yesterday ou were asked what hartwe l l ' s Lexington fee <br /> was and you didn ' t know , do you know it was to ? <br /> itect, the <br /> Stege reelish said <br /> 10% exceeds what we expect to pay the arch <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.