My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/25/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
1/25/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:02:52 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 1:51:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/25/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
decision about requiring this Committee to interview 5 more <br /> firms , They asked then to pick j 1 more. He thinks it was <br /> poor judgement on the parents part, specifically because they did <br /> not stay to list to the Finance Committee 10 year plan. <br /> Mir. Diniio stated they are the only constituency that has not <br /> been heard from. Many other have been pressuring the Selectmen <br /> and they have responded to that and asked this committee to take <br /> spec i f i action , <br /> what is wrong with parents getting vocal 9 They <br /> want this committee to be respected and to go about their <br /> business without interference from the Board of Selectmen. <br /> Al stated he is also disappointed in this committee . when they <br /> heard they had to interview 5 other firms, they should have <br /> called a Saturday meeting and get them all interviewed in 1 day <br /> and you then would have only lost 1 week{ <br /> The committee strongly disagreed with Mr. Folsi . They explained <br /> how much time, outside of their meetings they spend on this , <br /> calling references etc., <br /> Some people are now questioning the 1350 core capacity. <br /> Tori Fuda l a seat a letter to the Committee explaining how that <br /> figure was derived . <br /> Nancy caffyn stated the previous comm' ittee's report (EFNC) stated <br /> those figures were 'd i ff i cu 1 t to comprehend and stand behind. <br /> Mr. D i n i z i o explained Tom' s letter i s in response to that issue. <br /> He has made a projection based on a range of the population, with <br /> assumptions made. Based on current knowledge and assumption, the <br /> core facilities for 1 350 7 s appropriate, especially considering <br /> the 50-60 year life of the building. <br /> Ms, C of f y n said the previous report never said it was a solid <br /> figure. <br /> She also suggested that Committee's can produce a majority report <br /> and a minority report and also be submitted, it i s encouraged ,, <br /> Mr. D i n i z i o said Mr . F ud a l a is a town employee and he still sags <br /> 1350 is the number for the core facilities. The state has <br /> accepted 1350, using our statistics* <br /> Mr. Jones said if we don' t ever fill the high schoo 1 with 1350 , <br /> it can remain junior/senior high school and save the town from <br /> building another elementary school . <br /> Mr . Fol s i sated at the time the FFNC report was issued he was <br /> comfortable with the 1360, but a lot of good questions were <br /> raised at that meeting . <br /> Mr, Griffin made a motion to adjourn at 6 :45 p.m. Ms. <br /> Ah 1 ren seconded the motion, A 1 1 members were in favor <br /> 7-0 , ** <br /> NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING: February 1 at 4:00 p.gym, Middle school <br /> Minutes submitted by Arden R, cadrin <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.