My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/2/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
8/2/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:12:31 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:07:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/02/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Merry sue made a motion to instruct SMMA to build 2 models -site <br /> and building for a cost of $10 ,014 . 40 to be paid from <br /> re i mbu rsab 1 es . Paul seconded the motion . A 1 1 members were in <br /> favor , ** <br /> Next Steps : <br /> Ian is concerned about moving into the design development phase with an <br /> overages <br /> Paul said he is comfortable because he knows what SMMA ' s contract <br /> requirement i s , we won ' t have a better handle on the cost until the next <br /> phase . <br /> Ian said the committee will just get more and more in the hole , It could <br /> be additional wasted time trying to get back on track . He is concerned <br /> Ed F renette said there may be some things the Committee is not happy with <br /> but it may be the only way to proceed i .e . loosing some playing fie1d or <br /> even more extreme loosing the auxiliary gym. <br /> If you are comfortable with us proceeding , but saying we have to meet our <br /> contract requirements, SMMA will say you have to lose x , y or z and that is <br /> that. we will have to come down firmly with decisions . <br /> Paul said presently the cost is off $1 . 5 million on a 21 million project , <br /> a <br /> that is not much to be off <br /> Ray said you won ' t get better pricing until you qc.Dt better drawings ,, <br /> Paul said , in defense of Ian , there are some parts of the project to be <br /> looked at i . e . the f ront area - what wi I 1 shape changes do to the cost? <br /> Ray said they are working on this project, they are simplifying it . <br /> Ian said he i ,---> not comfortable . He wants to see prellh-Onary thought given <br /> to strategies in case it remains over budget <br /> Ed Frenette agrees . They wi 1 1 take an accounting of what changes the <br /> Committee has agreed to. <br /> ,doe asked if mechan i cal 1 y and e 1 ectr i ca l `i y they have closed I n on a cost <br /> for the infrastructure? Not yet <br /> st4 A needs an interim meeting with Chartwell re : the value management <br /> issues . <br /> Peter quickly reviewed the items the Committee discussed and/or decided <br /> upon before the architects arrived . <br /> Peter <br /> asked why they don ' t agree with lowering the foundation and adding a <br /> berm? <br /> Ed said it make every entrance look like a bunker , Dan said there is a <br /> problem with onoisture running off the higher elevation of the berm and it <br /> will dry out and be d i ff i cu 1 t to maintain . <br /> Peter asked SMMA to price it out . <br /> The committee will meet next week Aug 9th subcommittee reports . <br /> The architects will return in 2 weeks -Aug 16th . <br /> Merry sue made a motion to adjourn at 7 : 40 p .m Joe seconded the <br /> motion . A 1 1 members were in favor . ** <br /> Minutes submitted by Arden R . cadr i n . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.