My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/23/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
>
8/23/1994 SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2018 5:13:49 PM
Creation date
8/10/2018 3:09:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SCHOOL - HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/23/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br /> F J r <br /> ASHPEE HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE <br /> MINUTES OF ADJUST 23f 1994 <br /> Present were: Peter Diniio, Merry Sue Ahlgren, Stephen <br /> reelish, William Martiros , Joseph Polito, Michael. Pare, Bill <br /> Hauck, Greg Taylor, Bob hr-itenour, Bob Fournier, Mark Pare, <br /> Ian Aitch.inson, Tori wren, (Janice Mills arrived later) & <br /> An informal discussion occurred regarding choice of windows <br /> and their placement in the g mn and locker rooms, and input <br /> was given by the athletic director/PE .instructor from Weston <br /> Also, discussed was the weight room and making it an adaptive <br /> program if it becomes mandated, the possibilities for having <br /> a soccer field, concession stand, outdoor lighting, bubblers <br /> for tennis and practice area, and tennis courts . <br /> The meeting was called to order at 4: 30 p.m. <br /> The Minutes of August 16 , 1994 were accepted, <br /> Bill Haug reported on doors and code guidelines . <br /> Peter Dinin io stated that there is a need to investigate <br /> reducing the plant to get efficiency and save money . <br /> Mark Pare spoke on the variance for the septic system. He <br /> reported that two schools ( auset Regional and Tingsboro) were <br /> successful .in convincing DEP, and the water usage was less than <br /> Title v. It took IS months from start to completion. He <br /> described the factors involved in building a treatment plant, <br /> increasing the organic components in the treatment processr <br /> and general costs for add -ons (chemicals , sludge removal , <br /> phosphorous removal . Bill Martiros stated we need cost <br /> comparisons for a treatment plant vs. alternate systems. Steve <br /> Creel i sh is familiar with B ioc f ear, which DEP is favorable . <br /> Mary Sue Almgren wants to make sure that there is no problem <br /> with environmentalists over these systems * Peter stated the- <br /> State is not reimbursing for this and stressed the need to make <br /> a cost efficient choice. Mask Pare stated that he is not <br /> promoting any Particular system, but it is important to look <br /> at- the operating costs per year. Steve suggested that a meeting <br /> be set up with DEP to determine their preferences and have our <br /> Board of Health present along with Mark. Marg Sue suggested <br /> also meeting with environmentalists * Bob Fournier noted there <br /> are other manufacturers similar to Dioclear; we have to name <br /> three for the State. Title v numbers were designed before law <br /> flush toilets; 20 gallons per student was satisfactory. we <br /> have to look at waste as well as flow. Peter brought up the <br /> River issue and what concentrations would be reaching it and <br /> would the concentrated plume he a hazard. Mark stated that <br /> phosphorous s a.nd temperature will ,impact the River; there would <br /> need to be studies . Peter stated that we promised the town <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.