Laserfiche WebLink
Peter asked if SMMA can work with Michael Pare to come up with a <br /> scope of services for a consultant and a list of consultants tants to <br /> choose from. SMMA will come up with a list of consultants , <br /> Michael would 1 i <,e to see their references . <br /> Ian said he has reviewed the revised schedule . <br /> Ed sal d they feel it i s stl 11 pass i b l e to adhere to the same <br /> schedule but it is getting very tight. <br /> Paul asked them to tell the Committee when it becomes an issue . <br /> He does not want to be forced by a schedule . He is not going to <br /> vote on a scheme he is not happy with . <br /> The architects will return to meet with the Committee ttee i n 2 weeks . <br /> Paul explained he has some Tissues to discuss relative to the <br /> value analysis workshop . He agrees- it does not make sense to do <br /> a cost analysis on ever product but there are items where <br /> further review was needed and some items where a cost analysis <br /> study is required , The Committee has asked for more cost <br /> analysis stud i es t The Committee is looking for prod�,Acts that <br /> would enhance the design of the project . This is a rn�,lthod to <br /> improve the project not just cut costs . <br /> The first document produced byChartwell was more oast cutting <br /> thea value managements <br /> Based on the last report, it lacks 2 things : <br /> - the Committee c1c.E.1arly wanted more detailed review on sortie items <br /> and it is not there 1 . e emergency generator . <br /> the Committee warts to know the value of why they are ff; �%i r g a <br /> decision ie . duel fuel . <br /> The report should be for laymen to read and make a. decision . <br /> That is what he thought the Committee was going to get from <br /> Chartwell and they are not . <br /> Ian responded that going into the value management workshop there <br /> was a 4-5 million overrun and by virtue of that a lot of effort <br /> was oriented to getting it down to budget. They could not ignore <br /> that <br /> Paul said they could ignore i t . Their con tract i s based on value <br /> management. The Committee was clearly so 1d on the value <br /> management, the value added to the project that they could get <br /> from another firm, other than the architects . <br /> Ian said over half of the items in the report have a value added <br /> aspect and a lot were taken out by the architects because they <br /> were effecting the design ,, <br /> The value management workshop was a great assistance in getting <br /> bacl-, on tract . Because of the volume of work associated with <br /> that, they agreed some of the life cycle costin will have to go <br /> on later . He is not arguing they were contracted to do life <br /> cycle costing . <br /> Chartwell is still doing that work and will continue Until it i s <br /> complete , <br /> 7 <br />