Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> design fees to widen the lanes and sidewalk improvements. <br /> The loo, with 10% SMMA markup. <br /> 150 , 00-175 , 000 construction cost estimate. <br /> Paul received a response from town counsel on this issue . Any work on site <br /> 7s the responsibility of' SMMA, including the entrance , off site , the <br /> trailer park entrance or intersection, would be an additional fee . <br /> The sidewalk and lane widening are considered within the scope of SMMA' s <br /> contract; SMMA' s responsibility . <br /> Phil said they are going to take exception to that . <br /> Paul understands but ask that they do it quickly so this matter can be <br /> resolved . <br /> Steve thinks it is a lot of money for that level of engineering . <br /> Paul asked Tom wren to send a copy of VHB's estimate to Greg Taylor and ask <br /> his opinion on the fee . <br /> EIP FINAL SUBMISSION <br /> Paul said he only received every other page of the final draft so he is not <br /> prepared to comment on it now. <br /> He received comments from Sharon Rooney of the cape cod Commission , which <br /> were sent to TEPA: <br /> -- the E I P should include an analysis of average cuing of the intersection . <br /> Paul remembers a. cuing table in the report he read , <br /> Brian Lawlor told Phil they could deal with the comments , MEPA did not see <br /> anything that would change the report . <br /> Sharon Rooneyalso asked the status of the Southport project and how it <br /> would effect the project. <br /> . <br /> Brian Lawlor will file the final EIP on March 1 , there is a So day comment <br /> period , if no comments, it becomes final . <br /> CD COST ESTIMATE <br /> Phil said he spoke with their MEP Department and asked them to explore <br /> p <br /> other possible cost savings . Their feel they have out the savings as <br /> tightly as they can . <br /> They also explored the other suggestions : <br /> --- east side ( back) of the building , eliminate accent band savings of <br /> $5 , 000 , SMMA has already made that change. <br /> Phil explained the have made other small changes , where there is no impact <br /> to program or quality but have not identified a value for them. <br /> - reduce cafeteria glazing by 35% and provide masonry wall- $12 , 000 <br /> savings, <br /> deletion of cafeteria canopy $45 , 000 savings. <br /> SMMA feels the time to re-design and get committee approval , inflation <br /> would erode any potential cost savingsff <br /> Merry Sue thinks the canopy is an important part of the building . <br /> Steve said he is not willing to give up the athletic fields for the canopy . <br /> Peter reminded him they are not giving up the athletic facilities . <br /> Ian asked if there will be increased glare and heat in the cafeteria, <br /> without the canopy? <br /> Phil said a little more glare but because it is the west side , there i s not <br /> much concern for heat loading . <br /> 4 <br />