Laserfiche WebLink
for the building he does not want to see them cost more but he <br /> wants everyone to he aware that SMMA will he coming back for <br /> more , <br /> Paul asked ,Joel the design time to get these items completed? <br /> Joel said they- will s tart the site work immed i atel.v because it <br /> w i i i take 2 months for '11EPA review, That should be done within <br /> next 2-3 weeks at most . <br /> Paul asked if all design coUld be completed in 4 weeks? Joel said <br /> probably a, little longer . There are parts that will need <br /> approval by the Commit-tee. They will work as quickly as they can <br /> to get i t done <br /> Pail asked if the Committee wants to wait on this issue until <br /> they hear from SMMA on their additional fee request. <br /> Merry Sue said it is two issues , She rants to vote on this <br /> ton.ih t <br /> Steve agreed , Vote on this issuex tori aht t The Committee will <br /> adjust their perspectives now on later requests F <br /> Ian asked about the pricing of the change orders , docs this <br /> include detailed analysis , unit pricing? <br /> Paul said this is not a wavier form the contract requiremront i <br /> Thev have to provide details , <br /> PaUl made a, motion to forward to the Selectmen for their <br /> approval an additional fee for SMMA of $72 , 9005 for <br /> additional services related to incorporating the value <br /> added items to the current project , as voted by the <br /> Commi. t too Merry Size seconded the motion. <br /> Discussion: <br /> Bill said he does not feel the Committee should pay them': <br /> If Daedul.us is in error , he should pick up that fee . <br /> Paul said , tinder M114A' s contract ) the Committee does not have a <br /> lea to stand ori �( to not pay them) & <br /> Bill thinks there is room for nccotiating , at least . They have <br /> developed the concepts , spent time on -those items , that should be <br /> deducted from the fee . <br /> Joel_ said they did look at what the actual work is , this is not <br /> to start from nothing. <br /> Peter said the Committee did "buy" the plans , as they were , when <br /> they went out to bid . However, he wants everyone to understand <br /> there will be extra claims , <br /> tMcrry Sue said that issue is separate from this one <br /> Torn Wren said , in the contract , if it is deemed a. chance o_ order <br /> occurs only; because of something the architects left out , then <br /> that foo .is taken out . If -the Committee ' s motion can Include <br /> wording subject to SNA' s contract ; there is a mechanism In the <br /> contract in case there is doubt that work is belng done twice <br /> (work k a.l ready done ) . <br /> Paul said he also reviewed the contract . it is clear this is an <br />