Laserfiche WebLink
changes to the RFP to reduce costs, Ms. Rooney referenced Task 7 to prepare the conceptual <br /> design and suggested that it could be reduced to one design or eliminated and addressed at a later <br /> stage. Additionally, Task 9 to develop a draft IMA could be addressed at a later date once <br /> alternatives had been identified. Ms. Rooney felt that the tasks could be eliminated or reduced <br /> without impacting the intent of the study. The Chair agreed, noting that all tasks up to Task 6 <br /> seemed to represent the core of the study. Ms. Rooney suggested that CIC funding may return <br /> next year or the OEA funds or MassDevelopment funds may become available to address the <br /> removed tasks. The Chair also suggested eliminating Task 8. Mr. Tilton suggested leaving the <br /> tasks in the RFP and including an option to extend the contract in the future. Mr. Goddard <br /> inquired about Task 12 to 17 and it was confirmed that it was a typo. <br /> Ms. Rooney discussed edits to the draft as recommended by Board members and language <br /> required by the Cape Cod Commission procurement officer, Board members were in support of <br /> the edits. Mr. Cavossa expressed concern about pursuing a costly comprehensive study when <br /> private companies, such as Bay Colony and MassCoastal, had already considered similar projects <br /> that were determined too costly because it made little economic sense to use the rail for less than <br /> 100 miles. The Chair pointed out that the feasibility study was intended to assess other uses for <br /> the UCRTS, not necessarily specific to rail. Mr. Tilton stated that the study would determine <br /> feasible options. Mr. Barrett pointed out that there was a lot of land available at the site. Ms. <br /> Rooney inquired about funding for the appraisal and the UCRTS' contribution to funding the <br /> study. The Chair confirmed that the Board was willing to commit up to $25,000 toward the <br /> study. Ms. Rooney agreed to forward language to be used for correspondence with State <br /> Representatives to support the grant. <br /> Mr. Cavossa requested more information about what he should tell his customers about where <br /> the waste should be transported. The Chair responded that it was the responsibility of the haulers <br /> to mare a determination. Chairman Laurent stated that the commercial tonnage had dropped <br /> despite the increase in commercial development on the Upper Cape. Mr. Cavossa expressed <br /> concern about Bourne closing their air space and the UCRTS closing and suggested the <br /> possibility of increased truck travel over the bridge. The Chair suggested usage of other Cape <br /> transfer stations that accept commercial trucks, in response to Mr. Cavossa's question about <br /> where to send commercial waste. Mr. Barrett pointed out that the market changed every day and <br /> it was unfair of Mr. Cavossa to expect the Board to solve a commercial problem. Mr. Cavossa <br /> felt it was the responsibility of the Board due to flow control regulations. There was discussion <br /> about Bourne. Mr. Cavossa suggested that it was the fault of the Board to allow the IMA to <br /> lapse. W. Tilton pointed out that it was clear for a number of years that the UCRTS would be <br /> closing, and that out of consideration of the haulers, the Board was considering other options. <br /> Discussion of Notice of UCRTS Closure to MassCoastal Railroad, Haulers & Employees <br /> Chairman.Laurent reported that notice had been provided to MassCoastal and the haulers. <br /> Employees had not yet been given formal notice so the Chair indicated that she would follow up <br /> with Falmouth to find out their anticipated notification time frame. <br /> Review of Draft RFP for Short Term Reuse of UCRTS <br /> The Chair distributed notes to members of the Board for a proposed short-term use RFB for the <br /> facility. The first page reflected specific provision for the facility and the scope of services was <br /> 2 <br />