Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> ■ <br /> FY2 6 - $25,477.01 <br /> F F 2007 - $26,286.86 <br /> FY2 - $125,000.00 <br /> Sheldon Holzer seconded the motion. The motion vwras unanimously approved. <br /> D. release of Water District Overlay to Overlay surplus Account <br /> Sheldon Holzer rade a motion that the Board of Assses rs approve the release of the following Water <br /> District Overlay to the Overlay Surplus Account: <br /> FY2003 - $40.36 <br /> FY2 - $337.85 <br /> FY2 5 - $5,571.33 <br /> FY2 - $117757.93 <br /> FY2 - $172320.50 <br /> FY2 - $2.005.42 <br /> FY2 - $24,048.54 <br /> FY2010 - $143502.08 <br /> FY2 11 - $89573.28 <br /> Gregg Fraser seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved. <br /> E. state Tax Fora CP1 for FY2013 submitted for Approval by Board of Assessors <br /> Jason streebel stated that the tax form was prepared each year by Town Accountant Dawn Thayer. <br /> Mr. Streebel stated that he had reviewed the form and reported that the numbers on the report seemed <br /> accurate and appropriate. <br /> Sheldon Holzer made a motion that the Board of Assessors approve the State Tac Form CP1 for <br /> FY2013 submitted by Town Accountant Dawn Thayer. Gregg Fraser seconded the motion. The <br /> motion was unanimously approved. <br /> F. Discussion of State Owned Land <br /> Jason streebel stated that 5 years ago there was an issue with the state owned land. For the land that <br /> the state has acquired that was previously taxable in Mashpee, the state reimburses Mashpee in lost <br /> takes. The state and the DOR puts a value on the land every 5 years. Five years ago Mashpee had <br /> ars $89MM value, and dropped the value t 14 MM in their assessment. There were numerous <br /> errors, omissions and mistakes, both objective and subjective. After many months of negotiating and <br /> arbitrating the whole process, at the eleventh hour, an agreement was reached for $46.5MM in <br /> assessed value. This year the new values have dapped to just over 1 9MM, and the State has <br /> omitted any of the changes that previously had been worked out. Thea are simple mistakes that need <br /> to be worked out. One of the main areas of contention is South Cape Beach that originally was part of <br /> New wr S abury. It was permitted to have 14,000 square feet of commercial area, with another 500 sq. <br /> f#. of residential property. The permit is still effective, and the zoning Inas not changed. Jason streebel <br /> stated that the other area that he wants to contest is the State's methodology, which is only t <br /> allow what is considered a frontage to go back 40,000 sq. ft. Mr. Streebel's contention is that with a <br /> larger parcel of 200 acres, that is not how a developer would look at things: he would put a road in, <br /> and put a subdivision in. Jason streebel stated that he is meeting Friday with Town Counsel Patrick <br /> Costello and has filed an appeal with the APB and is prepared to go through another round of <br /> negotiations. <br /> G. Update on Redacted Executive session Minutes i <br /> Jason streebel stated that he is up to date on receipt of redacted executive session minutes and is <br /> working with IT for website posting. <br /> 2 <br />