My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/31/2013 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/31/2013 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2018 5:03:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2018 2:39:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/31/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> boulders have moved with wave action over the course of time and says that Joe Clauonno said <br /> that it's part of the annual maintenance. <br /> Kurt Bosma, Coastal Engineer with Woods Hole Group, states that the surveyor had located some <br /> boulders originally but could not excavate the bank to see how many boulders were there. They <br /> suspected there were some and the plan simply stated that the boulders were not part of the design. <br /> The design read that if there were boulders as the bank was being uncovered than to place therm a <br /> close as possible to where they were originally. <br /> Mr. Fogel states there are minutes and recorded videos of prior meetings where these boulders were <br /> reviewed ire great detail and determined that the boulders extended o'f ro m the end of the revetment. <br /> Mr. Fogel states that they are not past this issue because there i s still an extra 50-70' of boulders and <br /> it,was agreed upon that these boulders were not part of the design. Mr. Fogel says that Mr. Burman <br /> had commented that they are functioning as a wall. <br /> Chairman Fitzsimmons states that the boulders seam to be the main issue right now. Mr. <br /> Cola uonno states that he feels the boulders are helping the wave action for the project but they had <br /> previously discussed the boulders should be tucked into the corner. Mr. Bo ma states that he has n <br /> issue with removing the boulders and it would be feasible to relocate them in a good position but the <br /> question now is who will pay for it. Chairman Fitzsimmons states that the conclusion is to rove the <br /> boulders to the corner and remove the ores.that do not fit into the corner. Mr. Sweet states than if the <br /> boulders are going to be moved than there should be a plan/design submitted. IIIb. Boma says it i <br /> not simply moving the rocks; there needs to be an appropriate design with under layers and filter <br /> fabric. Mr. Mills states that Bayswater gives their permission for Tidewat h to design and implement <br /> the work. Mr. Fogel says that it is agreed that the plan should have under layers and filter fabric and <br /> also whatever boulders cannot be incorporated into the corner should go off site. Chairman <br /> Fitzsimmons mon asks who will be preparing the plan and Mr. Fogel says that New S abury will as it i <br /> their property. Agent McManus states that the Commission feels the boulders should be removed <br /> and the methodology to get.it done would be for the Commission to issue an Enforcement Order to <br /> New Seabury dictating that the boulders be removed or relocated from the current location. An <br /> F <br /> engineered plan must be generated to show how they will be relocated and it is not any concern of <br /> the Commission who pays for it. <br /> Mr. Fogel comments on the timbers and requests the Commission to direct Bayswater to put the <br /> spacers in. Mr. Fogel also states that the plan shows two alternating rows of 12"diameter x 15'.long <br /> timber piles plu minu 10' of embedment but he had thought he herd from previous meetings that <br /> they were only able to drive them -7'. Mr. Bos ma states that most of the pile were driven down 10' <br /> but some could not be and were cut at the top so they wouldn't extend too high. Mr. C la u nn <br /> states that some of the poles have 5 inches between there and they will put the 1'1 spacers on but it <br /> will not constitute roving the poles. Agent McManus states that the spacers should be made a <br /> priority which will ensure that 1 11 spacing will always be maintained. Mr. Colasuonno asks if it is 1 <br /> minimum and the agent confirms 1 inch. Mr. Gurnee says that he thinks it should be added that New <br /> Seabury should be diligent about keeping sand over the sand bags as it is.critical for protection and <br /> critical for keeping sand on the beach. IIIb. Gurnee states that it should be made a requirement to <br /> replenish when the bales are exposed. Chairman Fitzsimmons says that would involve charging the <br /> Order of Conditions and suggests letting it go for approximately a year or so and then they could <br /> determine what is needed in the future. Agent McManus states that they are required to profile and <br /> also notify.the Commission for each time they replenish. The agent also says that one of the <br /> suggestions from Mr. Berman was to have quarterly profiling instead of annual profiling. <br /> Agent McManus states the issue now is to authorize the issuance of two enforcement orders; one to <br /> recognize the removal of filter fabric and 2 x 4's from New Seabury property and the second to order <br /> the removal of the boulders from their current location; whether to be relocated or removed <br /> completely. If the boulders are to be relocated than it should be accompanied by a Notice of Intent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.