3/28/2013 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

[33-A3] Robyn Laukien states that some of the oak trees that are positioned close to the house with one in particular having branches hanging over the roof. Ms. Laukien would like to remove that tree along with another tree that was damaged from the storm. The damaged tree is leaning and is uprooted. Agent McManus asks if there is a methodology-for the removal of the uprooted tree because it will affect the coastal bank. Ms. Laukien says that she would like someone to come in and rebuild the stones and reinforce-the whole area. The agent states that the repairs to the stone wall would require an additional permit. Agent McManus also informs Ms. Laukien that she must submit a narrative for the tree removal on the bank any pruning or cutting of existing vegetation will require a vista pruning permit and also the dock and float will need to have permanent identification for all sections. Motion m de, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination 6:12 Michelle Greenfield, Trustee on behalf of 91 Greenfield Children's Trust (eel Way) Delineate, prune and maiiMai n a vista-corridor and an expansion f a previi ousl approved pati o/w lkwa area which will include required mitigation plantings - NOI ""Continued to April 11, 2013**** Resource Area: BVW, LSCS , Coastal Bank, Buffer Zone to Coastal Bank Material submitted: Vista PruningPlan & other Modifications 3112113 [43-501 Wayne Tavares is representing the applicant and explains that they would like to create a pruning corridor with maintenance in perpetuity. Mr. Tavares also says that the applicant would like to change the shape of the patio area. The pervious patio will include French drains. Mr. Tavares says there will be added mitigation; approximate total of 540 square feet. Agent McManus states that the o' corridor is not an accurate measurement based on the property width of 147 feet and suggests either continuing the hearing so that the' plan can be revised or close and issue pending receipt'of revised plan. Chairman Fitzsimmons says he would like to continue so that he can see the revised plan. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to continue to April 11, 2013 at 6:09pm 6:15 Glen Petrie 31 sand Dollar Lane) Rebuild wooden retaining wall in the same footprint-IRDA. Resource Area: Coastal BanklBVW Material submitted: Plot Plan Existing House 114113 BSS Design (submitted by Little River Boat) [54-131 Mark Burtis from Little Fiver Boat Yard is representing the applicant and explains that the existing retaining wall is failing and needs to be replaced. The new wall will consist of vertical sheeting secured with pilings going in the 4 arne foot print as the existing wall. The sheeting will go down about 3' more to protect against storm surge. Agent McManus mentions three trees that were cut on.this property without any permitting and this violation will be handled separately from this project application. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination 6:18 Robert Di erdi (246 M n m sc ► Island Road) Rebuild bulkhead gall and fined pier in the same footprint- RDA Resource Area: Coastal Bank, L SCSF, L UO, Suffer Zone to B VW Material submitted: Proposed Site Plan 8129112 Cape & Islands Engineering (submitted by Little River Boat) [59:411 Mark Burtis from Little Fiver Boat Yard is representing the applicant and explains that this wall i also failing but it was built differently with a fined pier running the entire length of the gall. Mr. Burtis states that he will pull this gall out and replace it in the same footprint but more elevated and using wood sheeting. The back will be filled with stone and covered with soil. Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried for a Negative Determination 3 r '