1/9/2014 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

r Joseph Dick (Landscape Architect) was present representing the applicants. Agent McManus reviewed the information that vas first presented on. ecem er 12. At that time, we hadn't received a letter from Natural Heritage. We did receive the letter and they approved the project. Also a landscape plan is what 1s being presented tonight. Joseph reviewed the landscape plan and what he was proposing which included bayberry, mature plant stock with a mixture of blueberry and choclerry and that they are reducing the lawn area. Agent McManus stated this vas a good plan and has a species composition that we have on our conservation plant list. He recommended bearberry for a stabilizing vegetation. There is no disturbance of any natural vegetation. The landscape plan combined with the dr wells adequately addresses concerns with runoff making its way clown the harp and causing any erosion issues. Mr. McManus read the Board of Health comments which approved a conventional title v septic system to accommodate a 4 bedroom dwelling. He rr co n ed a close and issue for the house and landscaping plan. No comments from the public Motion: Mr. Sweet moved to close and issue, seconded by Mr. Rogers. Vote unanimous. - 6:09 Shoestring Bay Nominee Trust, 21 Frog Pond Close. Proposed improvements to an existing marina. Continued from 12/1.2/13 - Commission requested Continuance to allow for Board/public review of storm water report, revised NOI and narrative. Resource Area: Land Under Ocean, Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage, Coastal Bank Bordering vegetated Wetland, Rare Species Habitat (NHESP) Mat ari l Submitted: cle engineering plans dated 11/15/13, which included plans of existing condition; proposed site plan, proposed timber bulkhead and timber float plan, proposed boat ramp and profile and typical section and recycling power wash pad plan. i Susan Nilson} CLE encyineering was preset to represent Shoestring Bay Nominee inee Trust. Agent McManus explained the Commissioners had time to review the materials submitted during the December er 1 hearing. We did.receive a letter from National Heritage and they approved the project. He asked the consultants to provide some more detail on the dredging and he wanted to have some assurances that there will be a siltation curtain and they have provided that information and a siltation curtain will be part of that activity to lessen any affects on the resource areas nearby.