Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Affordable Housing Committee <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> October 23, 2018 at 6:30 pm <br /> Mashpee Town Hall <br /> Approved 1214118 <br /> Present: Chairman Allan Isbitz, Walter Abbott,Berkeley Johnson,Bruce Willard <br /> Absent: Marie Stone <br /> 'Also: Town Planner, Evan Lehrer <br /> CALL TO ORDER <br /> Chairman Isbitz opened the meeting at 6:40 p.m. with a quorum, and the roll was called. <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> It was confirmed that minutes from the September meeting had been approved at the October 16 <br /> meeting. Minutes from the recording of the October 16 meeting had not yet been produced. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> 950 Falmouth Road,Review of the RFP Working Group Drafts-Chairman Isbitz <br /> turned first to the comparative evaluation criteria of the Request for Proposals. The Chair read <br /> through the draft of the criteria in order to identify any necessary changes. Edits appear on the <br /> draft on file. <br /> The Chair reported that, upon meeting with Laura Shufelt, she suggested that the Committee <br /> assign weight to each of the criteria categories. The Committee removed"SCORING"listed on <br /> the chart to avoid confusion and for each category, determined the appropriate points awarded <br /> for Advantageous and Highly Advantageous. The Chair noted that Ms. Shufeit recommended <br /> that, under M.G.L. Chapter 30B procurement regulations, if one RFP responding developer was <br /> interviewed, all developers would need to be interviewed. <br /> CRITERIA CATEGORY ADVANTAGEOUS HIGHLY ADVANTAGEOUS <br /> -Developer Experience& Capacity maximum 10 maximum 20 <br /> -Affordability & Support Services max 10 max 20 <br /> -Site Design max 5 max 10 <br /> -Infrastructure& Green Design. max 8 max 15 <br /> -Building Design max 8 max 15 <br /> -Financial Feasibility max 8 max 15 <br /> -References, Site Visits &Interviews max 2 or 3 max 5 <br /> The Chair discussed tax credit projects, clarifying that if units were 100%tax credit, unit rents <br /> would be set at no higher than 60%of the average median income. The Committee was also <br /> interested in offering moderate income units and the higher range of lower income and desired <br /> not to prohibit the option of market rent units. Ms. Shufelt had reported that market units were <br /> falling within 80%-100% of average median income. There was consensus to not be too <br /> restrictive. <br />