Laserfiche WebLink
Maspee Board of Server Commissioners <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> April 2 , 2012 at 7 p.m. <br /> Mashpee Town Hall, Selectmen's Meeting Room <br /> Present: Chairman Torn Fudala, Mark Gurnee, Oskar Klenert, Jack Malarkey <br /> Also Present: Paul Go ell-Sewer Commission minlstrat r, ,teff Gregg&Bill Hall-GHD, <br /> Absent: Joe Lyons <br /> CALL TO ORDER <br /> The meeting was called to order at 7.00 p.m. by Chairman Fudala. <br /> APPROVAL of MINUTES S February 16, 2012 <br /> The minutes will be considered at the next meeting. <br /> AGENDA ITEMS . <br /> Presentation by Don Walter of USGS on M shpee Solute Transport Model <br /> Mr. Walter was unable to publicly present the information before DEP review. <br /> Presentation of Gni]Proposals for SRF Scope of Work Changes <br /> Bill Hall, GHD, distributed and summarized information packets distributed to the <br /> Commissioners regarding the proposed amendment to the contract. Mr. Hall explained that the <br /> Original Scope(yellow) included nothing`boiler plate" as it would not change, to the scope of <br /> work related to the nutrient management plan. The original Cost Summer(green) identified the <br /> bottom line expense o $344,653. Mr. Hall offered to forward the most recent billing summary <br /> sheet in order to provide more current information. The Proposed Amendment Cover Sheet <br /> (blue), described as the signatory page, had been reviewed by Chairman Fudala and Town <br /> Counsel and related to Exhibit A Proposed Scope Amendment(salmon). The Proposed Scope <br /> Amendment reproved portions.of the existing contract and reinserted wording to better reflect the <br /> way in which the project would flow to completion and acceptance of a final recommended plan <br /> and environmental impact report. The Proposed Ann nded Cost Summary(pink) depicted <br /> serif is ta. l billing and vas current t the most rent Jibing. <br /> Mr. Gurnee inquired about the deletion of Tasks v-X on the Proposed Scope Amendment and <br /> the addition of Tasks VIR-Y, noting that there was no Task IX or X reflected on the Proposed <br /> Amended Cost Summary. Mr. Gregg responded that Tasks.IX and X had been rolled into the <br /> other tasks, but the Chair recomm- ended that they be added to the spreadsheet in order to be <br /> consistent with the text of the scope. The Chair noted that the tasks were not associated with any <br /> money. Chairman Fudala inquired about solute model assistance and Mr. Gregg responded that <br /> the solute model was under separate contract for $1.,5291, and not part of the main scope of work. <br /> The Chair stated that the amendment reflected xHD's incorporation of a variety of work items <br /> placing them under 8B, 8C and 8D, making a more logical course. fir. Hall confirmed that <br /> funds were removed from 6D, 6E3 6P, 6G, ' G, 7K 71 and 7J blending them into 8B and 8C. <br /> Chairman Fudala continued that the original scope included a specific preliminary design for an <br /> effluent pipeline, but that it no longer made sense since the direction of the planning had <br /> changed. Funds for the pipeline design were redirected to the development of the Plan.and the <br /> environmental review process. It was confirmed that the bottom lime remained the same. <br />