My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/18/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:05:51 AM
Creation date
1/2/2019 2:06:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/18/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
u <br /> P. Area around Mashpee Rotary north along Great Neck Road <br /> 0. Future Wampanoag Village site north towards Town Hall <br /> R. Northeast of Santuit Pond <br /> S. West of Santuit Pond(south picking up neighborhoods west and south of Willowbend) <br /> T. Area along Hie,130 between Town Hall and Sandwich <br /> Additional designations include: <br /> Sandwich Sewersheds 1 through 9 were used again(includes the northern most part of Mashpee) <br /> Falmouth Sewersheds 1 through 17 <br /> Barnstable Sewersheds 37,38,39,42 <br /> Miscellaneous areas were also picked up including`areas of Mashpee outside the watersheds, <br /> Popponesset Island,areas within the watersheds anticipated to remain on septic systems, and some <br /> clusters of I/A systems like Sconset Village and the NitrexTA4 system located near Town Hall. <br /> It's important to note that although these Alternatives present a way of identifying where flows and loads are <br /> collected,treated,and discharged,it is the nitrogen discharge and its location that is the critical piece for this <br /> first step in the process,modeling through MEP.Within any alternative that is ultimately developed,there <br /> remains the possibility that flows could be"traded"for balancing purposes if it is determined to be more cost <br /> effective. For example, around Johns Pond some properties may end up potentially being served at the <br /> Backroads Site, while other areas might end up outside of the watershed. Most likely there will be some <br /> balance between the loads generated from Southport and those generated from the areas south and west of <br /> the pond.Once the Options are approved through MEP,the more difficult tasks of cost estimating,refining, <br /> and phasing of any alternative plan can take place, however that is not the purpose of this part of the <br /> analysis. <br /> 1 Option 1A Description <br /> This option was a modification to the first of two presented in the Spring of 2011.The primary goal was to <br /> look at sending as much flow as possible to the existing Rock Landing well site,under the assumption that <br /> these wells would be relocated in the future. The balance of flow would either be managed within the <br /> watersheds or remain as flow from septic systems. <br /> The first table outlines where/how each part of the project planning area is proposed to be served in the <br /> future and where the treated effluent from that area would be recharged in order to meet the TMDLs. In <br /> Option 1A the majority of the flow is proposed to be sent to the Rock Landing Well site,which would require <br /> the relocation of those water supply wells,the majority of the smaller WWTF would remain although treated <br /> at a higher level,and portions of Sandwich,Falmouth and Barnstable would be treated out of the watershed. <br /> Figure 1 shows the location and discharge areas summarized on the Table. <br /> 2 Option 1 B Description <br /> This option was developed after receiving comments from the Sewer Commission on Option 1A.The primary <br /> goal was to look at how wastewater might be managed if the Rock Landing and New Seabury discharge <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.