Laserfiche WebLink
1 } <br /> developer who considered removing the flow from South Sandwich village out of the watershed. <br /> Mr. Steen also referenced Forestdale Village, noting that a final decision had not-yet been <br /> reached by the developer about their plans but that he was working on acquiring a discharge <br /> permit. The Chair inquired about the Forestdale School treatment plant and Mr. Steen responded <br /> that it may or may not happen and that the committee was still assessing the town's needs. The <br /> Chair inquired whether Mr. Steen was aware of the Farr Share approach, adding that Mashpee <br /> must assume that Sandwich would meet their fair share. Mr. Steen responded that there were <br /> still issues that needed to be discussed with the Fair Share approach. The Chair inquired whether <br /> the 40B project would be moving forward.and Mr. Steen responded that he had spoken to the <br /> developer who was interested in learning more about Sandwich's planning. There was <br /> discussion about the developer's need to offer a nitrogen offset. <br /> Returning to discussion about mon IB and its use of the Ke ter property,the option would <br /> also keep Sandwich and Barnstable within the watershed, adding a cluster system at Santuit Pond <br /> and the Nitrex pilot project at Pirate's Cove. The Keeter property would pick up the properties <br /> in yellow and the existing treatment facilities `New Seabury would recharge as it currently <br /> exi <br />